On Jan 16, 2008 2:17 AM, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1/ when downloading, does the load on each incoming interface
> (I assume you have one ethernet to each modem) match?
This is a pretty rough way to estimate it, but starting/stopping
tcpdump on each of the interfaces at the same
Michael MacLeod wrote:
Hello all,
I've got two DSL lines running to my house, and two WAN NIC's
installed in my FreeBSD router. I've been trying to get multilink ppp
working through my ISP (TekSavvy in Canada) for the last little while,
with mixed results. Each of my DSL lines sync's at 6016 kbi
Hello all,
I've got two DSL lines running to my house, and two WAN NIC's
installed in my FreeBSD router. I've been trying to get multilink ppp
working through my ISP (TekSavvy in Canada) for the last little while,
with mixed results. Each of my DSL lines sync's at 6016 kbits down and
800 kbits up.
On Jan 15, 2008 8:29 PM, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 January 2008 15:24:52 Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> > Alexandre Vieira wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I remember that there was a port (net/hoststated) where I could
> install
> > > hoststated to use with PF. Anyone can shed
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 15:24:52 Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Alexandre Vieira wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I remember that there was a port (net/hoststated) where I could install
> > hoststated to use with PF. Anyone can shed a light on what is the status of
> > this software implementation on 7.
Alexandre Vieira wrote:
Hello all,
I remember that there was a port (net/hoststated) where I could install
hoststated to use with PF. Anyone can shed a light on what is the status of
this software implementation on 7.0?
Perhaps ports/net/ifstated is the answer?
BMS
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:59:22AM +, Tom Judge wrote:
> Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
>> Tom Judge wrote:
>
>>> Personally I can't see why this approach would be a problem, but I am
>>> not a expert. The address is defined in IEEE Std 802.1D-2004 as to not
>>> be forwarded by bridges (which I i
Hello all,
I remember that there was a port (net/hoststated) where I could install
hoststated to use with PF. Anyone can shed a light on what is the status of
this software implementation on 7.0?
TIA
--
Alexandre Vieira - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 08:56:36AM +0800, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=119361
> > >
> > > Have you tested polling(4)? If polling could give you better TX
> > > performance, you should consider raise:
> > > in bge_attach()
> > > sc->bge_tx_max_coal_bds
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Thierry Herbelot wrote:
> > gives some measurements on various tweakings of an SMP machine with
> > 4 Xeon processors (it *shows* a nice improvement when using more
> > CPUs and more bonded Ethernet interfaces).
> >
> > Has some the machine (and the time, obviously) to make
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
Personally I can't see why this approach would be a problem, but I am
not a expert. The address is defined in IEEE Std 802.1D-2004 as to
not be forwarded by bridges (which I interpret as it being link local
in a sense as switches/bridges are not all
i am putting in a newegg order for when i visit the states in two weeks.
among other goodies, i may need a pci 802.11 card to work with current
in a soekris 5501 (see minipci saga elsewhere). what is smack on
compatible and solid? thanks.
randy
___
Greetings,
Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Hello,
a recent article
(http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-scalability/?ca=dgr-lnxw02FasterLinuxNet)
gives some measurements on various tweakings of an SMP machine with 4 Xeon
processors (it *shows* a nice improvement when using more CPUs an
13 matches
Mail list logo
