On Dec 7, 2007 2:46 AM, Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
>
> BMS>I can't comment on kernel scheduler jitter though, so someone who is
> working
> BMS>directly in that area will hopefully respond -- arch@ or hackers@
> might be a
> BMS>better pla
Thats why you combine if_bridge with monitor mode, any incoming packets
are discarded after bpf processing so they are never sent to opposing
devices.
Aha, using monitor mode hadn't occured to me, based on previous
discussion I was going to do more research on Monday, but thanks Andrew
you've
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 10:35:11AM +, Peter Wood wrote:
> Morning,
>
> >>> Looking thru the archives, it seems ng_one2many (in this case
> >>> 'many2one') is what I am looking for. Am I barking the right tree
> here?
>
> Strangely enough this is the exact situation I was looking into on Frida
Morning,
>>> Looking thru the archives, it seems ng_one2many (in this case
>>> 'many2one') is what I am looking for. Am I barking the right tree
here?
Strangely enough this is the exact situation I was looking into on
Friday for two mirror ports from our border routers via aggregation
switc
