On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Hi,
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
I'll try to find your bug the next days (in case you find anything let
me know).
At the very least, this will be necessary:
--- tcp_subr.c~2007-11-28 01:14:46.0 +
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Hi,
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
I'll try to find your bug the next days (in case you find anything let
me know).
At the very least, this will be necessary:
--- tcp_subr.c~2007-11-28 01:14:46.0 +
+++ tcp_subr.c 2007-11-28 01:14:46.
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> I'll try to find your bug the next days (in case you find anything let
> me know).
At the very least, this will be necessary:
--- tcp_subr.c~2007-11-28 01:14:46.0 +
+++ tcp_subr.c 2007-11-28 01:14:46.0 +
@@ -1948,7 +1948,7 @@
/*
Hello,
I have a pair of hosts. One of them performs a massive amount of
TCP connections to the other one, all to the same port. This setup
mostly works fine, but from time to time (that varies, from once a
minute to one a half an hour), the connect(2) syscall fails with
EADDRINUSE. The connection
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> not that this should fix your problem but you might want to start with
> this patch:
>
> http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/sys-netinet-tcp-syncache.c-20071126-01.diff
No, probably not. But it may fix a bunch of spurious failed SADB lookup
messages I've been see
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:03:38PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
> It seems that mii_ticks is not kicked at all in auto-negotiation
> phase. From the output of forced 1000baseSX media configuration I
> guess BRGPHY_BMSR_ACOMP bit in BRGPHY_MII_BMSR is not updated on
> 5708S. Mabe davidch know be
I'm very pleased to see ECN finally being implemented in FreeBSD.
Whilst I can't offer technical assistance in testing or review at this
time, I would like to thank you for the clearly professional level of
effort you have put into this.
regards,
BMS
__
mosaic wrote:
I would like to ask, whether there are any plans to implement multiple
route tables, like OpenBSD did:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2006-10/2665.html
Yup, we're aware of these changes.
[The feature you're referring to is actually the ability to have
multipl
