On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 05:18:53PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello
>
> We have problem with Broadcom NetXtreme II BMC5708 on our blade
> server.
>
> ifconfig bce0 report:
>
> bce0: flags=8847 mtu 1500
> options=3b
> inet 172.0.0.199 netmask 0xff00 broadcast
В сб, 24/11/2007 в 17:28 +0100, Andrea Venturoli пишет:
> After portupgrading two samba servers, I cannot connect any more to them
> through mount_smbfs. Connecting from Windows works fine.
>
> Am I the only one who is experiencing this problem?
Did you portupgrade with CVE patches?
See: grep C
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, James Healy wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While monitoring a data transfer between two 7-beta3 hosts with tcpdump
and SIFTR[1] last week, we noticed that SACK was not being negotiated as
expected.
James Healy and Lawrence Stewart
Good detective
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While monitoring a data transfer between two 7-beta3 hosts with tcpdump
and SIFTR[1] last week, we noticed that SACK was not being negotiated as
expected.
The SACK option was sent in the SYN, but the option wasn't sent back in
the SYNACK, despite SACK
On the up-to-date RELENG_7 system, I have configured ath0 in the adhoc
mode. After that, I tried to switch the interface into the hostap
mode. I got the consistent error message "Interface not
configured". After several attempts, I got the following page fault.
The second argument to the ieee80211_
Max Laier wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote:
Max Laier wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote:
Max Laier wrote:
On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote:
attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to
rmloc
Max Laier wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote:
> Max Laier wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote:
> > > Max Laier wrote:
> > > > On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> > > > > > attached is a diff to s
Per olof Ljungmark ha scritto:
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
After portupgrading two samba servers, I cannot connect any more to
them through mount_smbfs. Connecting from Windows works fine.
Am I the only one who is experiencing this problem?
No, we are at least two :-)
Ok, thanks.
Any hint on
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
After portupgrading two samba servers, I cannot connect any more to them
through mount_smbfs. Connecting from Windows works fine.
Am I the only one who is experiencing this problem?
No, we are at least two :-)
___
freebsd-net
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote:
> Max Laier wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote:
> > > Max Laier wrote:
> > > > On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> > > > > > attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) s
Max Laier wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote:
> Max Laier wrote:
> > On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> > > > attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks,
> > > > which are more suited for the task. I
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Darren Reed wrote:
> Max Laier wrote:
> > On Friday 23 November 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> > > > attached is a diff to switch the pfil(9) subsystem to rmlocks,
> > > > which are more suited for the task. I'd like some exposu
12 matches
Mail list logo
