Re: Should syncache.count ever be negative?

2007-11-09 Thread Matt Reimer
On Nov 9, 2007 7:46 PM, Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Matt Reimer wrote: > > > On a eight core machine running RELENG_7 I'm seeing TCP stalls, > > sometimes lasting up to 60 seconds or so. While trying to track this > > down I noticed that net.inet.tcp.syncache.

Re: Should syncache.count ever be negative?

2007-11-09 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Matt Reimer wrote: On a eight core machine running RELENG_7 I'm seeing TCP stalls, sometimes lasting up to 60 seconds or so. While trying to track this down I noticed that net.inet.tcp.syncache.count is negative. Should it be possible for the count to go negative? Perhaps it

Should syncache.count ever be negative?

2007-11-09 Thread Matt Reimer
On a eight core machine running RELENG_7 I'm seeing TCP stalls, sometimes lasting up to 60 seconds or so. While trying to track this down I noticed that net.inet.tcp.syncache.count is negative. Should it be possible for the count to go negative? Perhaps it indicates a race, or the counter is wrongl

Re: Bug?: (bge) BCM5787 makes 7.0/8-CURRENT completely unusable (Was: Issue: bge still freezes RELENG_7 system on HP Compaq 6710b)

2007-11-09 Thread Andrey Kosachenko
I suppose output of "uname -a", "pciconf -lv" and "dmesg" would be useful. Good time of the day. I'm not pleased to emphasize that BGE makes FreeBSD 7.0/8.0 systems completely unusable on machines with BCM5787 (NetLink BCM5787M Gigabit Ethernet) Install CD hangs as soon as it tries to load

Bug?: (bge) BCM5787 makes 7.0/8-CURRENT completely unusable (Was: Issue: bge still freezes RELENG_7 system on HP Compaq 6710b)

2007-11-09 Thread Andrey Kosachenko
Good time of the day. I'm not pleased to emphasize that BGE makes FreeBSD 7.0/8.0 systems completely unusable on machines with BCM5787 (NetLink BCM5787M Gigabit Ethernet) Install CD hangs as soon as it tries to load driver for Ethernet device (tested on 7-CURRENT (snapshots 200708, 200709, 2

Re: pf misfeature

2007-11-09 Thread Max Laier
On Friday 09 November 2007, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > No, I don't see why these two should behave differently, but you > > should add a "scrub in on sk0" in any case. > > scrub is known and documented to interfere with NFS. Only with broken NFS clients

Re: pf misfeature

2007-11-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, I don't see why these two should behave differently, but you should > add a "scrub in on sk0" in any case. scrub is known and documented to interfere with NFS. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _