Re: RELENG_7: can't connect to Solaris

2007-10-25 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: Yes problem was in firewall, not Solaris/FreeBSD tcp stacks. On Solaris was used ipfilter 3.4.18, and after 3.4.18 was fixed several bugs, which can cause such problems. Probably this: 4.1.17 - Released 20 January 2007 fix tracking TCP windo

Re: pppoa connection

2007-10-25 Thread Barney Wolff
Try just treating the modem's ethernet as though it were a local router port, using (unless they've assigned you a fixed address) DHCP. If your ISP is like mine, the PPPOA and 1483 stuff is between the modem and their router and invisible to you. On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 07:50:54PM -0600, Kim Shri

pppoa connection

2007-10-25 Thread Kim Shrier
I am wondering if the following is possible. My local ISP only uses pppoa for their DSL customers. They have provided me with an Actiontec GT701 DSL modem. I want to configure the modem to use RFC 1483 transparent bridging. This modem has both an ethernet and USB interface for the LAN connectio

Throughput problems in RELENG_7

2007-10-25 Thread Matthew Reimer
I'm seeing a problem where a much faster quad-core host running RELENG_7 serves many fewer netrate/http requests per second (175/sec) than an old, busy, UP 6.0 host (828/sec). The problem seems to be related to latency and connection setup, as it shows up dramatically over a link with 50-60 ms late

Re: RELENG_7: can't connect to Solaris

2007-10-25 Thread Anton Yuzhaninov
On 25.10.2007 20:59, Mike Silbersack wrote: On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: As silby@ already pointed out to me, try changing TCP_MAX_WINSHIFT in src/sys/netinet/tcp.h to 4. With TCP_MAX_WINSHIFT 4 it works. I have a fix for this already in HEAD, I'll merge it to releng_7 to

QinQ

2007-10-25 Thread Jon Otterholm
Hi. I was wondering about the possibility of adding support for QinQ ("Double tagged frames" / "Nested vlans"). Attached is a patch against -STABLE to add this support. I have not tested this but was told it should work. Would it be possible to get this into CURRENT? //Jon --- if_vlan.c.orig

Re: proxy arp on 6.1

2007-10-25 Thread Stephen Clark
Peter Jeremy wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 02:17:37PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote: I must be doing something wrong. I can't seem to get proxy arp to work. Is there some magic. I've been using proxy ARP on FreeBSD between 4.x and 6.2 without problems (though I think I skipped 6.1).

Re: proxy arp on 6.1

2007-10-25 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 02:17:37PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote: >I must be doing something wrong. I can't seem to get proxy arp to work. Is >there some magic. I've been using proxy ARP on FreeBSD between 4.x and 6.2 without problems (though I think I skipped 6.1). >I have the following setup isp

Re: RELENG_7: can't connect to Solaris

2007-10-25 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: As silby@ already pointed out to me, try changing TCP_MAX_WINSHIFT in src/sys/netinet/tcp.h to 4. With TCP_MAX_WINSHIFT 4 it works. I have a fix for this already in HEAD, I'll merge it to releng_7 tonight. But from other host with RELENG_7 tcp

Re: RELENG_7: can't connect to Solaris

2007-10-25 Thread Anton Yuzhaninov
On 25.10.2007 15:01, Rui Paulo wrote: On 25 Oct 2007, at 11:24, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: I can't connect from FreeBSD 7 box to Solaris 9. While between FreeBSD6 and Solaris 9 tcp work fine. I run on FreeBSD, and it nod't work: $ fetch -o /dev/null http://mail6:8274 fetch: transfer time

Re: proxy arp on 6.1

2007-10-25 Thread Stephen Clark
Stephen Clark wrote: Hello List, I must be doing something wrong. I can't seem to get proxy arp to work. Is there some magic. I have the following setup isp router 205.x.x.1 <-> 205.x.x.100/25 rl1 freebsd vr0 205.x.x.129/25 <-> 205.x.x.193/25 arp -an (205.x.x.1) at 00:13:7f:5a:b5:50 on rl1

Re: Marvell chipsets on 8-CURRENT and XP x64 won't talk with one another

2007-10-25 Thread Tom Judge
Garrett Cooper wrote: Mike Silbersack wrote: On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote: Just to clarify, how are the two hooked together? Is it over gigabit switch, a 10mbps hub, or directly cabled together? -Mike Sure. They're both connected over a gigabit switch, but the Windows dri

Re: RELENG_7: can't connect to Solaris

2007-10-25 Thread Rui Paulo
On 25 Oct 2007, at 11:24, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: I can't connect from FreeBSD 7 box to Solaris 9. While between FreeBSD6 and Solaris 9 tcp work fine. I run on FreeBSD, and it nod't work: $ fetch -o /dev/null http://mail6:8274 fetch: transfer timed out OS versions: FreeBSD citrin.ram

RELENG_7: can't connect to Solaris

2007-10-25 Thread Anton Yuzhaninov
I can't connect from FreeBSD 7 box to Solaris 9. While between FreeBSD6 and Solaris 9 tcp work fine. I run on FreeBSD, and it nod't work: $ fetch -o /dev/null http://mail6:8274 fetch: transfer timed out OS versions: FreeBSD citrin.rambler.stack.net 7.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE

Re: Routing problems

2007-10-25 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
LiuJiusheng wrote: Linux takes 6.6.6.2 as gateway for route 4.4.4/24. But some Oses have the gateway 2.2.2.2. (treat 4.4.4/24 as a recursive route). Is there any standard for this? No, this is entirely implementation specific. Some implementations of IP forwarding resolve the next-hop recur