On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 13:43 +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> At Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:54:11 +0900,
> Byung-Hee HWANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Let me say this.. I just like all stuff around IPv6. And now I need one
> > native IPv6 address for my FreeBSD box, which is email gateway. There
At Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:54:11 +0900,
Byung-Hee HWANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me say this.. I just like all stuff around IPv6. And now I need one
> native IPv6 address for my FreeBSD box, which is email gateway. There
> was unknown problem related to IPv6 area between my FreeBSD box
> [2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following is my configuration.
External Interface--->Internal Interface> Rest of network
1.2.3.4/2410.129.10.40/24
1.2.3.5/32 Alias
1.2.3.5/24 is the IP address all http traffic will come in on. 1.2.3.4/32
is the IP address all other traffic
Hi,
Mike Tancsa wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:26:10 +0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
wrote:
Bill Marquette wrote:
[skip]
What type of performance differences are you seeing with these
changes? Is this with FreeBSD acting as a router/firewall, or purely
RX queue is be
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I am seeing the em driver on 7.0 sending packets with bad UDP (and
apparently sometimes IP) packet length fields. This is from UDP NFS
traffic (90MB/sec over gige). These packets are dropped on reception by
the kernel and counted.
I think this is due to rollover of the
