Re: wireless recommendations ...

2007-10-11 Thread Cristian KLEIN
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > I'm looking to do some consulting on a project that will involve wireless > networks ... since, if it goes forward, I'm going to be the "Unix person", > so, > of course, the unix side will be FreeBSD ... > > ... but, I haven't used wireless at all under FreeBSD ...

Re: Bug in vr(4) driver

2007-10-11 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:51:25PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 27 August 2007 09:03:10 pm Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 08:18:08PM +, Bill Paul wrote: > > > > > > I recently started writing a driver for the Via Rhine family of chips > > > for VxWorks (the

Re: libpcap/tcpdump update

2007-10-11 Thread Max Laier
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Max Laier wrote: > On Sunday 30 September 2007, Max Laier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to get some eyes on > > http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tcpdump/ in order to get $subj into > > the tree. Let me know if you find any problems. Thanks. > > > > This should also t

Re: wireless recommendations ...

2007-10-11 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
0n Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 10:18:34PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >... but, I haven't used wireless at all under FreeBSD ... what do we support >*well*? The machine(s) are going to be remote, so I'd like to go with >something that is generally felt to be 'consistently reliable

wireless recommendations ...

2007-10-11 Thread Marc G. Fournier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm looking to do some consulting on a project that will involve wireless networks ... since, if it goes forward, I'm going to be the "Unix person", so, of course, the unix side will be FreeBSD ... ... but, I haven't used wireless at all under Free

Re: if_bridge on a vlan-trunk

2007-10-11 Thread Julian Elischer
Jon Otterholm wrote: Hi. Does anyone know if it is possible to put a transparent bridge on a vlan-trunk? A working solution is to create a bridge for each vlan, but I would prefer to have one bridge instead of several hundreds of them. Is this doable? it is using netgraph.. In my lab env

Using the latest em with 6.2 RELEASE

2007-10-11 Thread Jack Vogel
I realize now that I need to explain doing this. I just did a checkin that will allow the latest em code to work on 6.2, BUT, it will NOT work integrated into the RELEASE kernel tree, and I am not going to support that :) To do that would mean changing conf/files and so forth. Therefore, if you w

Re: if_bridge on a vlan-trunk

2007-10-11 Thread Andrew Thompson
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:42:15PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote: > Hi. > > Does anyone know if it is possible to put a transparent bridge on a > vlan-trunk? As from rev1.100 of if_bridge back in June it will correctly use the vlan number if the forwarding table so it is now possible to bridge a vla

if_bridge on a vlan-trunk

2007-10-11 Thread Jon Otterholm
Hi. Does anyone know if it is possible to put a transparent bridge on a vlan-trunk? A working solution is to create a bridge for each vlan, but I would prefer to have one bridge instead of several hundreds of them. Is this doable? In my lab environment I use a dual em(4) nic. What would the dr

Re: Panic in rt_check

2007-10-11 Thread Ivan Voras
Ivan Voras wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: > >> If the kernel still panics without IPv6 in it, I'll move on to other >> possible solutions (Doug's first). > > The kernel without IPv6 is running stable for the 7th day in a row. I'll > postpone trying Doug's patch for when I can afford some downtime. I

Re: Software for FreeBSD TCP R&D: SIFTR v1.1.4 and DPD v1.0 released

2007-10-11 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 12:22 +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > Hi Byung-Hee, > > Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 11:42 +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Just a quick heads up regarding the availability of a new SIFTR > >> (Statistical Information for TCP R

Re: Panic in rt_check

2007-10-11 Thread Ivan Voras
Ivan Voras wrote: > If the kernel still panics without IPv6 in it, I'll move on to other > possible solutions (Doug's first). The kernel without IPv6 is running stable for the 7th day in a row. I'll postpone trying Doug's patch for when I can afford some downtime. ___