Cristian KLEIN wrote:
Thank you all for your replies.
Kirill Ponazdyr wrote:
Hi list,
A few days ago I tested whether a FreeBSD 7 box is able to handle Gigabit
Can anybody point me what the bottleneck of this configuration is? CPU was
mostly idle and PCIe 1x should carry way more. Or is the ex
Cristian KLEIN wrote:
> Also, I used this setup to avoid TCPs
> congestion control mecachnism and sub-maximum bandwidth.
iperf can also run UDP tests.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rmkml wrote:
thx Vladimir,
I have litle tested your em driver,
quick comparaison :
kernel: sys=10% intr=25% user=15%
kernel+polling: sys=7% intr=5% user=15%
kernel+yandex_em: sys=30% intr=1% user=15%
same trafic (tcpreplay ~230Mbps)
fbsd62release_amd64 on intel core 2 duo E6600+4Go
It is possible
rmkml wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
very thank for your work on intel em driver !
just commented line 772 and added 773 :
771:/* Send a copy of the frame to the BPF listener */
772:/* ETHER_BPF_MTAP(ifp, m_head); */
773:BPF_MTAP(ifp, m_head);
what is ETHER_BPF_MTAP() ?
Michael DeMan wrote:
Hi All,
I've done some ad-hoc testing off and on for a few years. None of the
data around, but we do have a couple rules of thumb that we use
internally...
1) Get the fastest PCI bus you can - PCI-X, etc.
PCI-express outstrips PCI-X and has a number of nice characteri
Hi All,
I've done some ad-hoc testing off and on for a few years. None of
the data around, but we do have a couple rules of thumb that we use
internally...
1) Get the fastest PCI bus you can - PCI-X, etc.
2) Plan on 1GHz of CPU per 1 gigabit of throughput.
The performance hit going from
Thank you all for your replies.
Kirill Ponazdyr wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> A few days ago I tested whether a FreeBSD 7 box is able to handle Gigabit
>> Can anybody point me what the bottleneck of this configuration is? CPU was
>> mostly idle and PCIe 1x should carry way more. Or is the experiment
>>
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 04:07:04PM +0200, Seth Mos wrote:
> Hello Yvan,
Hi.
> I have tested the suggested workaorund in pfkey.c by raising the ceiling
> to 768kbytes from 128.
>
> I also raised the limit in the socketvar.h in FreeBSD 6 Stable from the
> default 128kbytes to 768kbytes.
>
> An
Hello Yvan,
I have tested the suggested workaorund in pfkey.c by raising the ceiling
to 768kbytes from 128.
I also raised the limit in the socketvar.h in FreeBSD 6 Stable from the
default 128kbytes to 768kbytes.
Any higher values then 768kbytes result in a integer overflow and
prevents a b
0n Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:52:43AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>I am adding support into the em driver for PTP
PTP ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence
Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT
1914. If you ha
0n Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:47:37PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>0n Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:52:43AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>>I am adding support into the em driver for PTP
>
>PTP ?
Found http://ptpd.sourceforge.net/. Sorry for the noise.
-aW
IMPORTANT: Th
11 matches
Mail list logo