bridging ath

2007-09-26 Thread Randy Bush
current i386 thinkpad t41 ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1/8" cloned_interfaces="bridge0" ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.0.3/24 addm em0 addm ath0 up" ifconfig_em0="up" ifconfig_ath0="ssid rgnet up" defaultrouter="192.168.0.1" with ether plugged in, i can ping it. unplug ether and no ping over ath0.

Re: Request for feedback on common data backstore in the kernel

2007-09-26 Thread Scott Long
Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi Scott, The discussion has been moved to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Please only reply there next time. On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Scott Long wrote: Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi, Please keep me CC'ed, hence I'm not on all these lists. In the kernel we currently

releng_6_2 pagefault

2007-09-26 Thread Max N. Boyarov
Hi, I have setup RELENG_6_2 system (also check on RELENG_6). But when packet come from net0 to net1 system do pagefault. This is 4 core Intel Xeon. debug.mpsafenet = 0. kernel builded with FAST_IPSEC support and isakmpd used for IKE exchange. net image net0 [ gif tunnel ] [ pf based router ] [ i

Re: Request for feedback on common data backstore in the kernel

2007-09-26 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi Scott, The discussion has been moved to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Please only reply there next time. On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Scott Long wrote: > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please keep me CC'ed, hence I'm not on all these lists. > > > > In the kernel we currently have two di

Re: new mbuf flag proposal

2007-09-26 Thread Julian Elischer
Oleg Bulyzhin wrote: Hi all. Recently, i discovered following problem (though it was already discussed, see http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-ipfw_2006/msg00491.html): pfil handlers (like ipfw or pf) sometime need to create packets (like tcp rst or icmp errors). In order to avoid loops M

Re: Request for feedback on common data backstore in the kernel

2007-09-26 Thread Scott Long
Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi, Please keep me CC'ed, hence I'm not on all these lists. In the kernel we currently have two different data backstores: struct mbuf and struct buf These two backstores serve two different device types. "mbufs" are for network devices and "buf" is for disk de

Re: if_em and if_vlan

2007-09-26 Thread Jack Vogel
This is not an issue in my current driver base, I am having our test group do some checking since I am not aware of the specific change that fixed this, I am not sure if the CURRENT code has the problem or not, also being tested. Jack On 9/26/07, Jon Otterholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. >

Panic in rt_check

2007-09-26 Thread Ivan Voras
Hi, I have a machine that panics almost daily in route.c, in rt_check(). This panic has been reported by several users, including Marcel Moolenaar for a machine in freebsd.org. The problem is present in both 6-STABLE and 7-CURRENT, and apparently it manifests on SMP machines, both i386 and A

if_em and if_vlan

2007-09-26 Thread Jon Otterholm
Hi. I get "Device busy" when trying to change VLAN-id on a sub-if to em0: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/user]# ifconfig vlan100 vlan 100 vlandev em0 ifconfig: SIOCSETVLAN: Device busy [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/user]# dmesg | grep em0 em0: port 0x4000-0x401f mem 0xee20-0xee21 irq 16 at device

Re: Request for feedback on common data backstore in the kernel

2007-09-26 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 01:31 +0200: > Please keep me CC'ed, hence I'm not on all these lists. > > In the kernel we currently have two different data backstores: > > struct mbuf > > and > > struct buf > > These two backstores serve two different device t