Re: bin/116643: [patch] fstat(1): add INET/INET6 socket details as in NetBSD and OpenBSD

2007-09-25 Thread remko
Synopsis: [patch] fstat(1): add INET/INET6 socket details as in NetBSD and OpenBSD Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: remko Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Sep 26 06:39:25 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: This looks like something for the -net team. ht

new mbuf flag proposal

2007-09-25 Thread Oleg Bulyzhin
Hi all. Recently, i discovered following problem (though it was already discussed, see http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-ipfw_2006/msg00491.html): pfil handlers (like ipfw or pf) sometime need to create packets (like tcp rst or icmp errors). In order to avoid loops M_SKIP_FIREWALL flag is

Request for feedback on common data backstore in the kernel

2007-09-25 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi, Please keep me CC'ed, hence I'm not on all these lists. In the kernel we currently have two different data backstores: struct mbuf and struct buf These two backstores serve two different device types. "mbufs" are for network devices and "buf" is for disk devices. Problem: The current

Re: Large-scale 1-1 NAT

2007-09-25 Thread Cristian KLEIN
>> There is another thing I wanted to point out. I remember you used the >> words "authentication web page". This made me think you are >> establishing a captive portal, which is not secure at all. If I >> understand well the authpf solution would be secure, except perhaps >> a small delay. You