Old Synopsis: Solid hang with bge interface
New Synopsis: [bge]: Solid hang with bge interface
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: remko
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Sep 21 06:15:58 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Reassign to networking team
http://w
Old Synopsis: network problems under -current, nfe(4) and jumbo packets
New Synopsis: [nfe]: network problems under -current, nfe(4) and jumbo packets
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: remko
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Sep 21 06:14:55 UTC 2007
Respons
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:49:11AM -0400, Yuri Lukin wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:24:09 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote
> >
> > Juniper is based on FreeBSD. ;-)
>
> On old code from the 4.x days I think, right?
Technically no, they've been updating large portions of the FreeBSD code
over time.
* Yuri Lukin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070920 16:49] wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:24:09 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote
> >
> > Juniper is based on FreeBSD. ;-)
> >
>
> On old code from the 4.x days I think, right?
In the current release, yes.
Would you like a router based on 5.x? :)
--
- Alfred
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:24:09 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote
>
> Juniper is based on FreeBSD. ;-)
>
On old code from the 4.x days I think, right?
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscr
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:39:27PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:54:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I have been digging into why the edsc module wasnt being loaded by
> > ifconfig and now have a patch.
> >
> > A few printfs showed the problem.
> >
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:54:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have been digging into why the edsc module wasnt being loaded by
> ifconfig and now have a patch.
>
> A few printfs showed the problem.
>
> # ifconfig edsc0 create
> ifmaybeload(edsc0)
> trying to find if_edsc or eds
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:54:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have been digging into why the edsc module wasnt being loaded by
> ifconfig and now have a patch.
>
> A few printfs showed the problem.
>
> # ifconfig edsc0 create
> ifmaybeload(edsc0)
> trying to find if_edsc or eds
Hi,
I have been digging into why the edsc module wasnt being loaded by
ifconfig and now have a patch.
A few printfs showed the problem.
# ifconfig edsc0 create
ifmaybeload(edsc0)
trying to find if_edsc or edsc0
found @ ed
Its comparing using the string length of the module name so any partial
On 9/20/07, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 20 September 2007, Christopher Chen wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > I'm running 6.2-RELEASE on some Pentium D's running and amd64 port.
> >
> > I'm doing some mildly interesting things with vlan tagging, etc, and I
> > want to also set up carp.
Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Can you please explain in a technical way how polling can benefit me
here in a dual-stacked situation? In all honesty, the last few months,
I've been seeing many mails to the lists saying 'polling' has caused
issues. (I'm not arguing, I'm just looking for reason ;)
I'm
On Thursday 20 September 2007, Christopher Chen wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I'm running 6.2-RELEASE on some Pentium D's running and amd64 port.
>
> I'm doing some mildly interesting things with vlan tagging, etc, and I
> want to also set up carp. On identical machines running the i386 port,
> this works corre
Hi:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE on some Pentium D's running and amd64 port.
I'm doing some mildly interesting things with vlan tagging, etc, and I
want to also set up carp. On identical machines running the i386 port,
this works correctly, but when running
ifconfig carp0
For instance, the process j
* Steve Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070919 21:14] wrote:
> >>> Essentially, I'd like a board with at *least* 6 PCI-X slots, and perhaps
> >>> 8 RAM slots (if I can find justification that my router will work better
> >>> with up to 16GB of memory).
> >
> > Why would you go with PCI-X? it's slow
Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> But OpenBGPD doesn't look like an alternative for you, if you are using
>> ipv6 as it only supports ipv4 route distribution (according to man pages)
>
> IPv6 is an absolute MANDATORY requirement. If a recommendation does not
> support IPv6, than it will NOT fit into my env
15 matches
Mail list logo