> Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Henri Hennebert wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I notice that after a reboot, my pf rules don't take the ipv6 address
> > (managed with ipv6_ifconfig_rl0="2001:.
BPF includes a divide instruction.
As best I can tell, libpcap does not ever output a BPF divide
instruction, which indicates that use of the BPF divide instruction is
probably going to be done with a BPF program created by hand.
Can anyone provide any examples of a BPF program where a divide
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:19:47 +0300
"Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>ports/netsed + pf/ipf (for transparent proxying)
>Of course, the overhead is big.
great, thanks , that may do - i may only need it for a proof of concept at this
time.
cheers,
B
_
{Beto|N
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:54:43 +0300
Alexander Motin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > is there any already existing Netgraph node that would allow me to replace
> > bytes in the data part of a packet? I'm talking about generic "foo" for
> > "BAR" replacement, tho
Synopsis: [ipv6] panic sbdrop after ICMP6, packet too big
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: remko
State-Changed-When: Sun Aug 26 17:53:54 UTC 2007
State-Changed-Why:
Duplicate of 99779, which was fixed on RELENG_6 with:
src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c: 1.280 (thanks frank for t
On 8/26/07, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all,
> is there any already existing Netgraph node that would allow me to replace
> bytes in the data part of a packet? I'm talking about generic "foo" for
> "BAR" replacement, though different lengths would be good too.
>
> or maybe
Hi.
Norberto Meijome wrote:
is there any already existing Netgraph node that would allow me to replace bytes in the data part
of a packet? I'm talking about generic "foo" for "BAR" replacement, though
different lengths would be good too.
There is no such node.
This is not an easy task to
The following reply was made to PR kern/113359; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Frank Behrens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/113359: panic sbdrop after ICMP6, packet too big
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:26:35 +0200
The bug is probably a dupl
