At Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:58:16 -0400,
Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Thanks for the very detailed response. We have worked around the
> problem for now with a simple shell script that looks for racoon
> falling over and simply restarting it.
>
> Does anyone know if this is fixed in 7-CURRENT? If so we ca
"Michael Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry if this is sorta n00bish, but I have a problem that Google hasn't
> answered for me yet...
> I have a moderately-sized network that I am trying to run, with about 70 or
> so machines on it. The DHCP server (running FreeBSD 6.2, IPv4 address:
>
Sorry if this is sorta n00bish, but I have a problem that Google hasn't
answered for me yet...
I have a moderately-sized network that I am trying to run, with about 70 or
so machines on it. The DHCP server (running FreeBSD 6.2, IPv4 address:
10.11.12.254, Subnet is 10.11.12.0/24) acts as a gateway
On 8/18/07, VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> It really looks like an old "known" (well, at least known by me...)
> problem with PFKey interface: it is quite impossible to set up more
> than 50-100 tunnels on a standard FreeBSD (and probably any other KAME
> based stack), because
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
In my case, as always, its a bit "special". I have
2 OPENVPN tunnels, which I sent over different transits to
the same end host. On that host, I do my NAT. SO, without
getting into all sorts of hot/heavy things, is there a simple
program to install to ping someth
"Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I know its been talked about before, did 1/2 an
> hour of Google...
>
> In my case, as always, its a bit "special". I have
> 2 OPENVPN tunnels, which I sent over different transits to
> the same end host. On that host, I do
Hi,
I know its been talked about before, did 1/2 an
hour of Google...
In my case, as always, its a bit "special". I have
2 OPENVPN tunnels, which I sent over different transits to
the same end host. On that host, I do my NAT. SO, without
getting into all sorts of hot/heavy things
Eric Masson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello,
> So outgoing l2tp packets should be esp transformed, right ?
I've been able to reproduce the problem on a -current box (sources from
yesterday), should I file a PR ?
Regards
Éric Masson
--
C'est vrai peut t'on renconter quelqu'un sur internet?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 04:53:56PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Hello!
Hi.
> We are trying to track down a problem that involves a large number of
> ipsec tunnels (in this case 80). Frequently racoon (ipsec-tools
> 0.7rc1 and also 0.6) will deadlock into the sbwait state or will enter
> a 100%
