Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alexander Motin wrote:
> Martha Pasikatan wrote:
>> I would like to be able to unhook a pppoe node hooked to link0 and
>> rehook it to a tee node. Can anyone give me a sample on how to do this?
>
> That's impossible. As soon as pppoe node hook is disc
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:34:55 +0800
blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the main enhancement for the commit?
Hi Susan,
please check the archives of net@ for several emails discussing this.
>
> Tracing back the discussion, It is all about NAT-T?
no, I only just brought this up.
>
> How is
Hi,
What is the main enhancement for the commit?
Tracing back the discussion, It is all about NAT-T?
How is the FAST_IPSEC for IPv6?
Thanks.
BR,
Susan
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:31:05 +0200
VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://vanhu.free.fr/FreeBSD/pat
Yes it does except for the "multiple/bundled ASCONF" sub-feature
which is available as a separate patch.
If you have any questions, please let me or Randall Stewart
know. There is a minor patch that I've been meaning to get
to, but it probably will not impact you.
thanks,
--peter
sazzadur rahm
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:31:05 +0200
VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://vanhu.free.fr/FreeBSD/patch-natt-freebsd6-.diff
> applies to STABLE, and currently does not needs update. It may apply
> to -CURRENT, but won't compile cleanly.
great, thanks Yvan , will try soon.
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:28:15 + (UTC)
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Norberto Meijome wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:58:05 + (UTC)
> > "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> >>
> >>>
Alexander Motin wrote:
Martha Pasikatan wrote:
I would like to be able to unhook a pppoe node hooked to link0 and
rehook it to a tee node. Can anyone give me a sample on how to do this?
That's impossible. As soon as pppoe node hook is disconnected all
related info will be destroyed and ses
Hi,
I was just wondering whether SCTP implementation in FreeBSD supports "dynamic
address reconfiguration" (
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-addip-sctp-22.txt) ? I
would appriciate any help in this regard.
Thanks in advance,
Sazzad.
___
That sucks! Hope it gets resolved soon.
Brandon
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 06:11:54 -0500
Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They stopped routing for my ISP's block... They've got a ticket in
> to fix the problem, but IPv6 isn't a top priority for the trunks at
> this time, from what I'm bei
> Sorry for the top post, please try following patch:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/if_bce.c.diff
>
> This is probably the cause; I noticed it when bce(4) was
> ported to DragonFly.
>
Thanks Sephe, I think you're on to something. I have some
debug code in the driver to simulate mbuf alloc
Martha Pasikatan wrote:
I would like to be able to unhook a pppoe node hooked to link0 and rehook it to a tee node. Can anyone give me a sample on how to do this?
That's impossible. As soon as pppoe node hook is disconnected all
related info will be destroyed and session will be terminated.
On 7/2/07, David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eduardo Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When a host who is talking to be deletes its arp entry which has my IP
> address, communication goes down, and fxp2 never replies to arp
> requests. Co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eduardo Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When a host who is talking to be deletes its arp entry which has my IP
> address, communication goes down, and fxp2 never replies to arp
> requests. Completly ignores arp, in fact.
Your premise is that the
Hello,
I have faced a problem with fxp(4) driver which never happened before,
in the same server, while I was using other device (rl(4)).
When a host who is talking to be deletes its arp entry which has my IP
address, communication goes down, and fxp2 never replies to arp
requests. Completly ign
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:16:27AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> thanks. Just to be clear, do you mean 'NATT patches only available
> for -CURRENT', or 'NATT patches for -CURRENT should apply OK in
> -STABLE' ?
Hi.
http://vanhu.free.fr/FreeBSD/patch-natt-freebsd6-.diff
applies to STABLE, and
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Norberto Meijome wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:58:05 + (UTC)
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:10:22 +0900
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please let myself of bz@ know of any issues. I'm att
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:58:05 + (UTC)
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Norberto Meijome wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:10:22 +0900
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Please let myself of bz@ know of any issues. I'm attempting a build
> >> of a fresh tre
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:10:22 +0900
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please let myself of bz@ know of any issues. I'm attempting a build
of a fresh tree now.
Great , thanks for all the time and effort invested :)
One question, is NAT Traversal supported n
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:10:22 +0900
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please let myself of bz@ know of any issues. I'm attempting a build
> of a fresh tree now.
Great , thanks for all the time and effort invested :)
One question, is NAT Traversal supported now on -STABLE without the patches
that are f
hi,
i use freeBSD 6.2 and i wand to upgrade the kernel with ESPv3 (RFC 4306)
is there a developpement for this RFC for freeBSD
thanks
ckadi
-
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail
Hi,
I would like to be able to unhook a pppoe node hooked to link0 and rehook it to
a tee node. Can anyone give me a sample on how to do this?
matt
-
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
Visit the Yahoo! Auto Gre
They stopped routing for my ISP's block... They've got a ticket in to
fix the problem, but IPv6 isn't a top priority for the trunks at this
time, from what I'm being told.
On Jul 1, 2007, at 9:14 PMJul 1, 2007, Brandon Penglase wrote:
Whats the issue up on Verizon/Alter/UUNet? I didn't thin
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
a kern/38554 netchanging interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work
s kern/39937 netipstealth
23 matches
Mail list logo
