Hi,
I am using CURRENT on a Soekris 4801 (sis ethernet). With a recent
kernel all TCP packets sent via sis0 have a bad checksum. Other
systems using other interface types (though I don't have a broad
selection to test) don't seem to suffer from this problem.
There was a thread in freebsd-c
If memory serves me right, George Michaelson wrote:
> on a 6-STABLE host, I added:
>
> ipv6_enable="YES"
> ipv6_network_interfaces="bge1"
>
> to rc.conf, and ran /etc/rc.d/network_ipv6
>
> this did not bring IPv6 live. rtsol reported problems with get_llflag()
> calls. However acro
on a 6-STABLE host, I added:
ipv6_enable="YES"
ipv6_network_interfaces="bge1"
to rc.conf, and ran /etc/rc.d/network_ipv6
this did not bring IPv6 live. rtsol reported problems with get_llflag()
calls. However across reboot, the system came up with IPv6 fine.
Can somebody explain w
Hi,
I have a question about the RTT/srtt calculation in presence of the
timestamp option.
If timestamp is nor present, RTT is not calculated for retransmits due
to karn's algorithm. However with timestamps even retransmits factor
into the RTT calculation. I understand that this is useful in
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:06:16 +0100
Joe Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kern.ipc.nmbclusters
FWIW, this one in particular ( controls mbuf clusters) will made a huge
difference back in the FBSD 4 days on very heavily used websites. I've had them
tuned up to the order of almost 100K - over that
Also send this to the list(s) so people can see that the patches
actually work ;-)
Max Laier wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 June 2007, you wrote:
>> Max Laier wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 13 June 2007, you wrote:
Just as a data point. Will be happy to test altq as soon as it works
;-)
>>> Just sent a
Julian Elischer wrote:
I have some thoughts on this.
firstly, while it is interesting to have an arp table (ok LLA table)
on each interface, I'm not sure that it gains you very much.
Unfortunately maintaining a single ARP table is insufficient for
supporting multiple paths within the IPv4 st
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 05:51:44PM +, Qing Li wrote:
[luigi:]
i agree that the timing is a bit tight for inclusion, especially
because the work dates back to 2004 if not before, and i think Qing
Li took over development at least two years ago - not a great track
record
