I use wireless on a FreeBSD 6.1 box in an area of low signal to my
Access Point.
I want to be able to inspect the signal strength/quality so that I may
adjust the antenna to get best results. What is the best diagnostic to use?
For instance:
wicontrol wi0
produces:
...
Comms quality/signal/
On 2007-Jun-17 13:02:38 -0600, "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Doing the math on 10^9 connections in a week translates to ~1650/s, so we'd
>expect there are on the order of 100-200 connections steady state at any
>time. I suspect that the peak load may be up to 100 times that, which i
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, 13:02-0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Joe Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > Greetings,
> : >
> : > I have a friend who is having problems with a service he's running.
> : > He gets billions and billio
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Joe Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > Greetings,
: >
: > I have a friend who is having problems with a service he's running.
: > He gets billions and billions of connections to this service a day.
: > Somewhere between 10^8 a
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, 11:38-0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> OK. I'm getting very frustrated with my TCP connections hanging. It
> happens when I log into remote sites, when I try to encode dvds, etc.
> It is driving me nuts. This is with current from today. Current from
> 5 or 6 weeks ago doesn't
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, M. Warner Losh wrote:
I have a friend who is having problems with a service he's running. He gets
billions and billions of connections to this service a day. Somewhere
between 10^8 and 10^9 connections, he notices that his servers lose the
ability to accept new connection
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have a friend who is having problems with a service he's running.
> He gets billions and billions of connections to this service a day.
> Somewhere between 10^8 and 10^9 connections, he notices that his
> servers lose the ability to accept new connections.
Greetings,
I have a friend who is having problems with a service he's running.
He gets billions and billions of connections to this service a day.
Somewhere between 10^8 and 10^9 connections, he notices that his
servers lose the ability to accept new connections. These are TCP
connections.
This
OK. I'm getting very frustrated with my TCP connections hanging. It
happens when I log into remote sites, when I try to encode dvds, etc.
It is driving me nuts. This is with current from today. Current from
5 or 6 weeks ago doesn't seem to be bothered by this issue.
Has anybody else seen it?
Howdy,
In preparation for changes in CURRENT, aka 7.0, I have produced a
patch that removes Kame IPsec and adds support for IPv6 to
FAST_IPSEC. I have produced a patch which applies and compiles here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~gnn/fast_ipv6.20070617.diff
I am still testing the kernel I built in
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 10:09:56PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Sorry, I checked RELENG_6. I've been told that rpc.lockd(8) and
> rpc.statd(8) now have the "-p" option in -CURRENT. It seems that
> nfsd(8)'s port number is assigned in recorded in services(5).
> Therefore my question will be tota
# ifconfig vlan100 create inet 1.2.3.4/24 vlan 100 vlandev xl0
# ifconfig vlan100
vlan100: flags=8843 mtu 1500
inet 1.2.3.4 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 1.2.3.255
ether 00:10:5a:48:ce:a4
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )
status: active
vlan: 100 parent
Max, good day.
Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:47:24AM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> $subject at: http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/PF41/
I glanced over the new code and found that no changes were
introduced to the altq_subr.c. And there was rather old issue
I found in April: non-initialised callback due to
Rudy Rucker wrote:
>
> Works for me, but if you put in the 'inet' if breaks.
I've noticed that too, so I split it in a separate line.
> Is inet inherited from the 'vlandev' and therefore redundant?
It can't be - VLANs are Ethernet-level constructs.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Synopsis: inconsistent behaviour in arp reply of a bridge
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jun 17 09:17:28 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=10325
15 matches
Mail list logo