how ipfw2 handles fragmented packets

2007-05-28 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
Hello, I have a question about how the ipfw2 implementation performs stateful operation for (IPv4/IPv6) fragmented packets. Is it possible to make a state for a flow and match that state against fragmented packets? As far as I can see from the source code (sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c) it seems impossibl

bge0 watchdog timeout?

2007-05-28 Thread Steve Kargl
No one on the freebsd-current mailing list seems to know how to avoid the following: May 28 16:39:59 node13 kernel: bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting May 28 16:39:59 node13 kernel: bge0: link state changed to DOWN May 28 16:40:02 node13 kernel: bge0: link state changed to UP This is causing all

Re: kern/113053: syncache broken in latest FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT

2007-05-28 Thread Andre Oppermann
Synopsis: syncache broken in latest FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->andre Responsible-Changed-By: andre Responsible-Changed-When: Mon May 28 15:18:19 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Take over. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113053 _

Re: kern/113053: syncache broken in latest FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT

2007-05-28 Thread Andre Oppermann
Mark Linimon wrote: Synopsis: syncache broken in latest FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Mon May 28 12:05:46 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: This does not sound i386-specific. http://www.free

Re: System hang with Ralink RT2661

2007-05-28 Thread Boris Kochergin
Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: On 5/27/07, Boris Kochergin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi. I got an "SMC SMCWPCI-GM" card the other day, which is one of these: May 27 01:16:55 router kernel: ral0: mem 0xf400-0xf4007fff irq 10 at device 13.0 on pci0 May 27 01:16:55 router kernel: ral0: MAC/BBP RT26

Re: kern/113053: syncache broken in latest FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT

2007-05-28 Thread Mark Linimon
Synopsis: syncache broken in latest FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Mon May 28 12:05:46 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: This does not sound i386-specific. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cg

Current problem reports assigned to you

2007-05-28 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description a kern/38554 netchanging interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work s kern/39937 netipstealth

Re: debuging a hung kernel

2007-05-28 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
Redirecting from @net to @stable. Please, remove @net from future mails. On Monday 28 May 2007 11:54, Robert Watson wrote: > On Mon, 28 May 2007, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > >> On Monday 28 May 2007 10:57, Julian Elischer wrote: > >>> Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > On Tu

Re: debuging a hung kernel

2007-05-28 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Julian Elischer wrote: Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: On Monday 28 May 2007 10:57, Julian Elischer wrote: Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: On Tuesday 22 May 2007 10:06, I wrote: Hello everybody, I just managed to lock my box and I want to report it define "lock"? Does it still res

Re: System hang with Ralink RT2661

2007-05-28 Thread Sepherosa Ziehau
On 5/27/07, Boris Kochergin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi. I got an "SMC SMCWPCI-GM" card the other day, which is one of these: May 27 01:16:55 router kernel: ral0: mem 0xf400-0xf4007fff irq 10 at device 13.0 on pci0 May 27 01:16:55 router kernel: ral0: MAC/BBP RT2661D, RF RT2529 (MIMO XR)

Re: two public ip addresses on one interface

2007-05-28 Thread Julian Elischer
Wilkinson, Alex wrote: 0n Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:43:21AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: >Alex, good day. > >Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:07:41PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: >> > If your aliases are part of the same subnet as the "primary" or first configured IP, then you w

debuging a hung kernel

2007-05-28 Thread Julian Elischer
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: On Monday 28 May 2007 10:57, Julian Elischer wrote: Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: On Tuesday 22 May 2007 10:06, I wrote: Hello everybody, I just managed to lock my box and I want to report it define "lock"? Does it still respond to on the keyboard? No, but I was tryi

Re: ng_pptpgre + netmask_change results to lock

2007-05-28 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On Monday 28 May 2007 10:57, Julian Elischer wrote: > Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > > On Tuesday 22 May 2007 10:06, I wrote: > >> Hello everybody, > >> > >> I just managed to lock my box and I want to report it > > define "lock"? > > Does it still respond to on the keyboard? No, but I was trying to

Re: two public ip addresses on one interface

2007-05-28 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
0n Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:43:21AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: >Alex, good day. > >Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:07:41PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: >> > If your aliases are part of the same subnet as the "primary" or first configured IP, then you want to >> > use

Re: ng_pptpgre + netmask_change results to lock

2007-05-28 Thread Julian Elischer
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: On Tuesday 22 May 2007 10:06, I wrote: Hello everybody, I just managed to lock my box and I want to report it define "lock"? Does it still respond to on the keyboard? (Assuming you have the debugger in your kernel?). Does it still ping? Sometimes these still re

Re: two public ip addresses on one interface

2007-05-28 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Alex, good day. Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:07:41PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: > > If your aliases are part of the same subnet as the "primary" or first > configured IP, then you want to > > use the all-1's netmask. In your case, however, the second IP is part > of a completely differen

Re: ng_pptpgre + netmask_change results to lock

2007-05-28 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 10:06, I wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I just managed to lock my box and I want to report it > in case it's known(or it helps in some way). It is a > 6.2-STABLE from March 13. I did update to RELENG_6. > The procedure that triggers > the lock is simple: > > 1) Create a p