Any success with Intel Wi-Fi on IBM Lenovo R60 and FreeBSD 6.x?

2007-03-16 Thread Alex Povolotsky
Hello! Does anyone have any positive experience with Intel WiFi adapter on Lenovo R60 with FreeBSD 6.X? Native driver or ndis, does not matter. Alex. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To

kernel panic when using safe(4)

2007-03-16 Thread Rajkumar S
Hi, I am trying to install SafeNet 1141 support in one of the freebsd boxes here. according to safe(4), I have to add "device safe" into my kernel config and compile to enable hardware crypto acceleration. But after I boot with safe module enabled I get a kernel panic. The last couple of lines i

Re: if_bridge & pf

2007-03-16 Thread Andrew Thompson
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:01:01PM +0200, Stefan Lambrev wrote: > Hello, > > I have 2 firewalls, and every of them have 2 bridged interfaces + STP , > running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE > Unfortunately one of them is totally dead (hw problems) and I have to > make new one, but I plan to use > FreeBSD-6.

[PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE

2007-03-16 Thread Jung-uk Kim
I have made bge(4) patch for -STABLE (sorry, not suitable for RELENG_6_2): http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/bge_releng6.diff I received few success reports but I need wider testing because changes are too big and there are two many BCM57xx variants out there. If it breaks anything, please let

Re: Why the IPFilter version on FreeBSD6.2 is former than the one on FreeBSD6.0 ?

2007-03-16 Thread Brad
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:27:58 +0800 "speedo chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all: > > Below links show that > > *IPFilter* has been updated from 3.4.35 to 4.1.18. On > FreeBSD6.0 *IPFilter* has been updated from 4.1.8 to 4.1.13. On > FreeBSD6.2 > > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/

Herzlichen Glückwunsch, du hast einen Tag gewonnen

2007-03-16 Thread Marion.Backera
Du bist ausgelost, du hast 1 Tag Dil do Sau gewonnen für 4,95 Euro http://dildosau.com/?pid=71366&hc=0&trial=1 [http://dildosau.com/?pid=71366&hc=0&trial=1] ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net T

Why the IPFilter version on FreeBSD6.2 is former than the one on FreeBSD6.0 ?

2007-03-16 Thread speedo chen
Hi all: Below links show that *IPFilter* has been updated from 3.4.35 to 4.1.18. On FreeBSD6.0 *IPFilter* has been updated from 4.1.8 to 4.1.13.On FreeBSD6.2 http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#CONTRIB http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/relnotes-i386.htm

Re: ether_input question

2007-03-16 Thread Aniruddha Bohra
Robert Watson wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Aniruddha Bohra wrote: My question is : Does ether_input() assume it is the only thread executing the code? If it is the case, what is the reason for dropping the lock in the DEVICE_POLLING case? I can't speak to the details of the above, but can spea

Re: kern/106722: [net] [patch] ifconfig may not connect an interface to known network

2007-03-16 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: Thursday, March 15, 2007, 7:30:54 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote: AO> IMO when configuring a interface with an IP address and network it should AO> kick out previous host and/or network routes matching it. Unless those AO> are from locally configured interfaces, then it shoul

Re: ether_input question

2007-03-16 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Aniruddha Bohra wrote: In two drivers, fxp and em, the assumptions about entering the ether_input routine are different. From em_rxeof: #ifdef DEVICE_POLLING EM_UNLOCK() (*ifp->if_input)() EM_UNLOCK() #else (*ifp->if_input)() #endif While in fxp: FXP_UNLOCK() (*ifp->if_

ether_input question

2007-03-16 Thread Aniruddha Bohra
Hi, In two drivers, fxp and em, the assumptions about entering the ether_input routine are different. From em_rxeof: #ifdef DEVICE_POLLING EM_UNLOCK() (*ifp->if_input)() EM_UNLOCK() #else (*ifp->if_input)() #endif While in fxp: FXP_UNLOCK() (*ifp->if_input)() FXP_LOCK() My question is : Do

Re: if_bridge & pf

2007-03-16 Thread Max Laier
On Friday 16 March 2007 11:01, Stefan Lambrev wrote: > I have 2 firewalls, and every of them have 2 bridged interfaces + STP , > running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE > Unfortunately one of them is totally dead (hw problems) and I have to > make new one, but I plan to use > FreeBSD-6.2-STABLE. > > My question

Re[2]: kern/106722: [net] [patch] ifconfig may not connect an interface to known network

2007-03-16 Thread Anton Yuzhaninov
Thursday, March 15, 2007, 7:30:54 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote: AO> IMO when configuring a interface with an IP address and network it should AO> kick out previous host and/or network routes matching it. Unless those AO> are from locally configured interfaces, then it should reject the new AO> attem

if_bridge & pf

2007-03-16 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Hello, I have 2 firewalls, and every of them have 2 bridged interfaces + STP , running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE Unfortunately one of them is totally dead (hw problems) and I have to make new one, but I plan to use FreeBSD-6.2-STABLE. My question is are there any know compatibility issues between 6.

Re: tap(4) should go UP if opened

2007-03-16 Thread Frank Behrens
Bruce M. Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14 Mar 2007 13:09: > Please try the attached patch, which puts this behaviour under a sysctl. It works well as expected. Many thanks! I created a PR http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=110383 with the hope the patch will be commited. Regards,