Re: problem with ng_device as tun replacement

2007-02-13 Thread Tomas Svensson
Julian Elischer wrote: Tomas Svensson wrote: Hi, I am trying to replace the tun interface using netgraph by linking ng_device and ng_iface: ngctl mkpeer iface dummy inet ngctl mkpeer ng0: device inet inet then I try to use it as a drop-in replacement for tun, but it doesn't really work:

Re: pmtud problem

2007-02-13 Thread Alexander Motin
Stephen Clark wrote: if the pc sends a packet of 1460 bytes with the DF bit set shouldn't the freebsd 4.9 system send back an icmp dest unreachable - fragmentation needed and DF bit set? Are you blocking icmp with a firewall filter? Good question - but the answer is no. The other interesting

Re: pmtud problem

2007-02-13 Thread Stephen Clark
Eli Dart wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Clark wrote: if the pc sends a packet of 1460 bytes with the DF bit set shouldn't the freebsd 4.9 system send back an icmp dest unreachable - fragmentation needed and DF bit set? Are you blocking icmp with a fir

Re: "route add" how it behaves

2007-02-13 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
Kather Rafi -TLS,Chennai wrote: Hi all, I am new to FreeBSD. I want to know how the "route add " is working for the network routes and host routes in the case of with out specifying the gateway. In linux we can add like "route add -host 10.0.12.24 eth0" but in FreeBSD it should be like "route

Re: pmtud problem

2007-02-13 Thread Eli Dart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Clark wrote: > if the pc sends a packet of 1460 bytes with the DF bit set shouldn't the > freebsd 4.9 system > send back an icmp dest unreachable - fragmentation needed and DF bit set? Are you blocking icmp with a firewall filter?

pmtud problem

2007-02-13 Thread Stephen Clark
Hello List, We have a setup that looks like the following. pc <-ethernet-> freebsd 4.9 <-pppoe-> internet <-ethernet-> freebsd 6.1 on the freebsd box we have a gre tunnel with a mtu of 1420 feeding into a gif vpn tunnel with a mtu of 1280 ( I know this dumb but it the default value when you cr

"route add" how it behaves

2007-02-13 Thread Kather Rafi -TLS,Chennai
Hi all, I am new to FreeBSD. I want to know how the "route add " is working for the network routes and host routes in the case of with out specifying the gateway. In linux we can add like "route add -host 10.0.12.24 eth0" but in FreeBSD it should be like "route add -host 10.0.12.24 -iface fxp0"

Re: Mpd-4.1 released

2007-02-13 Thread Alexander Motin
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: --- ng_l2tp.c.origSat Feb 10 06:58:03 2007 +++ ng_l2tp.cSat Feb 10 06:58:00 2007 @@ -1121,6 +1121,10 @@ /* If ack is still outstanding, send a ZLB */ -if (seq->xack != seq->nr) +if (seq->xack != seq->nr) { ng_l2tp_xmit_ctrl(priv, NULL, seq->ns)

Re: Mpd-4.1 released

2007-02-13 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi, --- ng_l2tp.c.orig Sat Feb 10 06:58:03 2007 +++ ng_l2tp.c Sat Feb 10 06:58:00 2007 @@ -1121,6 +1121,10 @@ /* If ack is still outstanding, send a ZLB */ - if (seq->xack != seq->nr) + if (seq->xack != seq->nr) {

Re: Mpd-4.1 released

2007-02-13 Thread Andrew Bliznak
2007/2/13, Alexander Motin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Andrew Bliznak wrote: > One more questions. > a) Device type l2tp (copy pppoe config with changed device type) > produce INVARIANTS KASSERT in sys/netgraph/ng_l2tp.c on first packet > from nearest cisco :( I know about one KASSERT problem in ng_l2t

Re: Mpd-4.1 released

2007-02-13 Thread Alexander Motin
Andrew Bliznak wrote: One more questions. a) Device type l2tp (copy pppoe config with changed device type) produce INVARIANTS KASSERT in sys/netgraph/ng_l2tp.c on first packet from nearest cisco :( I know about one KASSERT problem in ng_l2tp. I have already sent patches to the commiter and wai

Re: Networking FreeBSD Wiki

2007-02-13 Thread Max Laier
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 08:05, Tsuyoshi MOMOSE wrote: > George, > > On 2007/02/09, at 10:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've started a Wiki page in the FreeBSD Wiki in an attempt to > > coordinate some of the clean up work and networking projects that > > aren't already covered.

Re: Mpd-4.1 released

2007-02-13 Thread Andrew Bliznak
2007/2/13, Alexander Motin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi. Andrew Bliznak wrote: > I have set netflow node option in mpd.conf to attach to > existing ng_netflow node > --- > default: > load psrv1 > load psrv3 > ... > pppoe: > ... > set netflow node netflow > set netflow export 172.16.2.35 9996 > ... >

Re: Mpd-4.1 released

2007-02-13 Thread Alexander Motin
Hi. Andrew Bliznak wrote: I have set netflow node option in mpd.conf to attach to existing ng_netflow node --- default: load psrv1 load psrv3 ... pppoe: ... set netflow node netflow set netflow export 172.16.2.35 9996 ... psrv1: new -n -i ng1 pppoe1 pppoe1 load pppoe 'set netflow ...' options

Re: Mpd-4.1 released

2007-02-13 Thread Andrew Bliznak
Hi, I am glad to present you the first stable release of mpd4.x branch - the mpd4.1! Thank you very much, great software! I testing it now and have some bug reports... I have set netflow node option in mpd.conf to attach to existing ng_netflow node --- default: load psrv1 load psrv3 ... ppp