George,
Thanks. I can think of a whole bunch of things to drop in here.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've started a Wiki page in the FreeBSD Wiki in an attempt to
coordinate some of the clean up work and networking projects that
aren't already covered. Please see:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Net
I plan to commit this soon as part of the mrouting cleanup.
Bring the IPv4 multicast forwarding code more into line with the IPv6
version, by unconditionally building with PIM support enabled, and
allowing it to be built as a loadable module.
Use encap_attach_func() to hookup the IPPROTO_PIM inpu
Synopsis: [netgraph] [patch] ng_ksocket fails to clear multicast flag on mbuf
before passing to stack
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->bms
Responsible-Changed-By: bms
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Feb 9 02:39:10 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'll take this
http://www.freebsd.org/cg
If memory serves me right, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> I mean that it may be that between -RELEASE and -STABLE, other things
> have changed, e.g. network rc scripts, /sbin/route itself, etc, which
> may also influence this behaviour. I'm sure more than only nd6.c
> changed. :)
Hi,
I've started a Wiki page in the FreeBSD Wiki in an attempt to
coordinate some of the clean up work and networking projects that
aren't already covered. Please see:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Networking
and update (if you're a committer) or email me corrections etc.
Best,
George
__
Hi,
You may look at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-kernel-limits.html
especially "section 11.13.2.2"
Also addresses below are useful; take a look:
http://www-didc.lbl.gov/TCP-tuning/FreeBSD.html
http://www.wormulon.net/files/pub/FreeBSD_Network_Tuning_-_slid
Hi,
These should (I hope) be in ports soon but I also wanted to announce
them here. I've now updated PCS, the Packet Construction Set, to 0.4
Beta. The changes etc. are in the changelog with the release at
http://pcs.sf.net.
I have also written something I think all the network folks will like
On Feb 8, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
Javier Henderson wrote:
FWIW, I was running BIND 9.3.2 for a while and in awe at the
amount of
memory it would use, and how it would go CPU bound after it hit any
operating system imposed memory quotas.
Many people have reported this problem,
Javier Henderson wrote:
> FWIW, I was running BIND 9.3.2 for a while and in awe at the amount of
> memory it would use, and how it would go CPU bound after it hit any
> operating system imposed memory quotas.
Many people have reported this problem, but no one has been able to
follow up on getting
On Feb 8, 2007, at 3:46 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
In the future, please don't cross post to both freebsd-questions, and
another list at the same time. Thanks.
Steven Bens wrote:
Dear mailinglist members,
I have an serious issue with bind.
System information:
Dual P3 1 GHz
6.1-RELEASE-p12 FreeB
any suggestions for how to tune freebsd tcp for very large bandwidth
delay product. doing daily rsync from oregon to australia over I2
and aarnet. getting mediocre transfers. hints appreciated.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
In the future, please don't cross post to both freebsd-questions, and
another list at the same time. Thanks.
Steven Bens wrote:
> Dear mailinglist members,
>
> I have an serious issue with bind.
>
> System information:
> Dual P3 1 GHz
> 6.1-RELEASE-p12 FreeBSD
> SMP kernel
>
> I'm running BIND
Invitation
Please consider contributing to ICAS 2007, ICNS 2007 and the associated
workshops listed below.
Conference: June 19-25, 2007, Athens, Greece
Important deadline for full paper submission: February 10, 2007
Please forward the Call for Submissions to the appropriate groups.
==
Dear mailinglist members,
I have an serious issue with bind.
System information:
Dual P3 1 GHz
6.1-RELEASE-p12 FreeBSD
SMP kernel
I'm running BIND 9.3.2 on this box (the one that is standard delivered with
6.1)
And when the named is running for a copple of hours. Bind doesn't accept TCP
connecti
14 matches
Mail list logo