On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Randall Stewart wrote:
Well.. no I believe someone (was in Lin) mentioned that
you can get a live-lock if you allow a reduction.. and
thus the mbuf clusters were NOT allowed to be reduced..
I messed around with this a bit when changing the limit on
net.inet.tcp.maxtcptw.
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:56:49 -0800,
> "Eugene M. Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Note that the two automatically configured addresses on em0 are still
> preferred, while the prefix 2001:470:1f01:3222::/64 is deprecated on the
> router.
> I believe rtadvd(8) should advertise deprecated
2006/12/14, Oleg Bulyzhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:55:51AM +, MQ wrote:
> 2006/12/12, Oleg Bulyzhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 11:54:01AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> >> Forwarding to net@ list and to Oleg, who has made polling
> >> support
Hello,
I am running a 6.1-RELEASE system, one IP (v4) address
configured, everything is wonderful.
Now, in the past I have added additional IPv4
addresses with this command:
ifconfig fxp0 alias 192.168.0.2 netmask
255.255.255.255
Easy. So now, I need to add a ipv6 address for the
first time,
Greetings,
Unless disabled with -s flag, rtadvd(8) automatically picks up on-link
prefixes from the routing table and includes them in RA messages. In
doing so, rtadvd does not seem to distinguish preferred prefixes
(preferred lifetime > 0) from distinguished ones (pltime = 0), but
simply adverti
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 05:05:32PM +0100, Robin Gruyters wrote:
> On 13-Jan-2007 Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
> >
> >> Could you please test attached patch? It should fix ierrs issue
> >and should not
> >> break link events (would be fine to test it: unplug/plug cable,
> >try to change
> >> media with
Jouke Witteveen wrote:
Hello all,
I'm in need of some information on how to utilize SIOCADDMULTI. It is
supposed to be demonstrated by the mtest [1] program, but that doesn't
do anything (on an SIOCDELMULTI rn it appears nothing was added:
ENOENT), At least not for the values I tested, 1.80.c2.0
Hi,
If any of you out there have network interfaces which have broken
ALLMULTI handling (i.e. they can't handle multicast routing), I would
love to hear from you.
Regards,
BMS
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Hello all,
I'm in need of some information on how to utilize SIOCADDMULTI. It is
supposed to be demonstrated by the mtest [1] program, but that doesn't
do anything (on an SIOCDELMULTI rn it appears nothing was added:
ENOENT), At least not for the values I tested, 1.80.c2.0.0.1 in
particular. I pr
Konrad Heuer wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> is there an analogon to the Linux sysctl variable "tcp_fin_timeout" in
> FreeBSD to force the system to close still open TCP connections after
> some time?
>
> Any hint would be great.
If I understand correctly, 'tcp_fin_timeout' on Linux sets timeout
>
> It is possible to record logs of all connections nated with the PF?
> Already tried to use "nat log on...", without success.
>
The version of PF used in FreeBSD (OpenBSD rev 3.7 I believe) doesn't have
the log option for either nat pass or rdr pass.
That facility came in later versions of
It is possible to record logs of all connections nated with the PF?
Already tried to use "nat log on...", without success.
Thanks.
--
Daniel Dias Gonçalves
DGNET Network Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dgnetwork.com.br/
+55 37-99824809
+55 37-32421109
_
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
a kern/38554 netchanging interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work
s kern/39937 netipstealth
This has now been applied to -CURRENT after testing by a 3rd party.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
14 matches
Mail list logo