Re: Converting Cisco shorthand to route statement

2007-02-01 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
> > Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a line on my router : > > > > ip route 172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel0 > > > > > > I'd like to change it to something that > > doesn't use the "Tunnel0" as a destination, that > > could be used in a "route" statement. > > >

Re: Converting Cisco shorthand to route statement

2007-02-01 Thread Joe Holden
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: Hi, I have a line on my router : ip route 172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel0 I'd like to change it to something that doesn't use the "Tunnel0" as a destination, that could be used in a "route" statement. Thanks, Tuc Err, I am going to

Converting Cisco shorthand to route statement

2007-02-01 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi, I have a line on my router : ip route 172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel0 I'd like to change it to something that doesn't use the "Tunnel0" as a destination, that could be used in a "route" statement. Thanks, Tuc ___

ETIMEDOUT bug

2007-02-01 Thread Dave Baukus
There is a bug tcp_output() for at least freeBSD6.1 that causes a perfectly good TCP to be dropped by its retransmit timer; the application receives ETIMEDOUT. Consider a TCP that never transmits (the receive end of the ttcp utility is an example), while the TCP is established snd_max == snd_una

Re: mpd locking system?

2007-02-01 Thread Wishmaster
Hello Alex, Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 2:40:09 PM, you wrote: AP> Hello! AP> for about 4-5 days, I'm expeirencing heavy troubles with my VPN (mpd) AP> 6.1-RELEASE based server. AP> After some time (minimum 2 seconds, maximum 12 hours) of running MPD AP> with moderate load (about 100-200 clien

Re: About NAT Traversal

2007-02-01 Thread Eric W. Bates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:46:49AM -0500, Eric W. Bates wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> ashoke saha wrote: >>> basic kame (racoon) as NAT_T for IKE. It did not have >>> kernel support till 6.0.

Re: ipfw pipe show ... help with output is needed, please.

2007-02-01 Thread Arone Silimantia
> > Second, there are seven headings (from BKT at the left to Drp on the > > right) but underneath those seven headings are _9_ values. What I really > > want to know is how many packets I am droppinig ... but I can't tell which > > of the fields are the "dropped" - I assume it is the final number

Re: About NAT Traversal

2007-02-01 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:46:49AM -0500, Eric W. Bates wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > ashoke saha wrote: > > basic kame (racoon) as NAT_T for IKE. It did not have > > kernel support till 6.0. you can take the patch from > > there. > > also NAT_T has moved from draft

Re: About NAT Traversal

2007-02-01 Thread Eric W. Bates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ashoke saha wrote: > basic kame (racoon) as NAT_T for IKE. It did not have > kernel support till 6.0. you can take the patch from > there. > also NAT_T has moved from draft to RFC and do google > for NAT_T to get get the RFC's and also read the code

Re: mpd locking system?

2007-02-01 Thread Wishmaster
Hello Alex, Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 2:40:09 PM, you wrote: AP> Hello! AP> for about 4-5 days, I'm expeirencing heavy troubles with my VPN (mpd) AP> 6.1-RELEASE based server. AP> After some time (minimum 2 seconds, maximum 12 hours) of running MPD AP> with moderate load (about 100-200 clien