Hello Jeff,
Monday, January 22, 2007, 4:39:28 PM, you wrote:
JR> MQ wrote:
>> 2007/1/22, Wishmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> Hello LI,
>>>
>>> Sunday, January 21, 2007, 12:52:55 AM, you wrote:
>>>
>>> LX> Wishmaster wrote:
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ke
Hello LI,
Monday, January 22, 2007, 6:30:26 AM, you wrote:
LX> Wishmaster wrote:
>> Hello LI,
>>
>> Sunday, January 21, 2007, 12:52:55 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> LX> Wishmaster wrote:
Hi,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/92090
>>
>> LX> Have you tried this one?
>>
>> L
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Randall Stewart writes:
> Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > Randall Stewart writes:
> > >nmbclusters = 1024 + maxusers * 64;
> > > +nmbjumbop = 100 + (maxusers * 4);
> >
> > The limit on page-size jumbos seems far too small. Since the socket
> > buffe
Julian Elischer wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c.diff?r1=1.290&r2=1.291
}
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c.diff?r1=1.84&r2=1.85
}
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_var
Julian Elischer wrote:
Steve Watt wrote:
On Jan 22, 9:15, Uwe Doering wrote:
} Subject: Re: Interesting TCP issue
} Steve Watt wrote:
} > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer wrote:
} > } > [ Snip discussion of symptoms of window scaling broken when
} > talking to at least the skype mail ser
Andre Oppermann wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c.diff?r1=1.290&r2=1.291
}
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c.diff?r1=1.84&r2=1.85
}
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/tcp_var.h.diff?r1=1.127&r2=1.12
Steve Watt wrote:
On Jan 22, 9:15, Uwe Doering wrote:
} Subject: Re: Interesting TCP issue
} Steve Watt wrote:
} > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer wrote:
} >
} > [ Snip discussion of symptoms of window scaling broken when
} > talking to at least the skype mail servers. ]
} >
} >> we h
Randall Stewart writes:
> Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > Randall Stewart writes:
> > > nmbclusters = 1024 + maxusers * 64;
> > > +nmbjumbop = 100 + (maxusers * 4);
> >
> > The limit on page-size jumbos seems far too small. Since the socket
> > buffer code now uses page-siz
MQ wrote:
2007/1/22, Wishmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello LI,
Sunday, January 21, 2007, 12:52:55 AM, you wrote:
LX> Wishmaster wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/92090
LX> Have you tried this one?
LX> http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/patch-bge-releng
2007/1/22, Wishmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello LI,
Sunday, January 21, 2007, 12:52:55 AM, you wrote:
LX> Wishmaster wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/92090
LX> Have you tried this one?
LX> http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/patch-bge-releng62
LX> Che
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
a kern/38554 netchanging interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work
s kern/39937 netipstealth
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Bruce Evans wrote:
% ...
Then it got to here with only relatively minor glitches:
% 16:41:12.947085 IP phiplex.bde.org.1735978781 > besplex.bde.org.nfs: 1472
write fh 1028,575312/94220 8192 bytes @ 0x2d6000
% 16:41:12.947086 IP phiplex.bde.org > besplex.bde.org: udp
% 16
Bruce A. Mah wrote:
>> and later I found out it was caused by commit 1.48.2.16:
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-December/031853.html
>
> This isn't consistent with what I'm finding. For one thing, rev.
> 1.48.2.16 of nd6.c isn't in 6.2-RELEASE but I saw the problem there
13 matches
Mail list logo