Re: Different behavior of ping'ing INADDR_BROADCAST?

2007-01-13 Thread gnn
At Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:37:51 +, Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > I'm personally not in favour of sending a single broadcast packet to > multiple interfaces as it has potential for denial of service, and > doesn't seem to be consistent with the behaviour of other systems, > or the most common use-case

Re: [Fwd: Re: bge Ierr rate increase from 5.3R -> 6.1R]

2007-01-13 Thread Oleg Bulyzhin
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 01:14:55PM +0300, Oleg Bulyzhin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:14:16PM -0800, John Polstra wrote: > > > I've been using #2 today, and it's working well so far. I > > implemented it like this. (Ignore the version numbers; I'm working > > in a private repository.) > >

Re: [Fwd: Re: bge Ierr rate increase from 5.3R -> 6.1R]

2007-01-13 Thread Oleg Bulyzhin
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:14:16PM -0800, John Polstra wrote: > I've been using #2 today, and it's working well so far. I > implemented it like this. (Ignore the version numbers; I'm working > in a private repository.) > > --- if_bge.c8 Jan 2007 22:46:51 - 1.26 > +++ if_bge.c9