At Sun, 17 Dec 2006 11:27:18 -0500,
randall wrote:
> It allows you to do a partial checksum on a udp packet.. the idea
> behind it is for when we have link layers that can delivered damaged
> packets we can then feed the packets to media players.. that can
> still use the data.. even though damaged
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nyoman Bogi Aditya Karna wrote:
> our VPN server is using mpd3.18 + freebsd6.1
> and currently we provide 250 VPN connections
> for our students and it works well.
>
> but when i try to make 500 connections
> the mpd failed to run.
>
> i suspect it w
our VPN server is using mpd3.18 + freebsd6.1
and currently we provide 250 VPN connections
for our students and it works well.
but when i try to make 500 connections
the mpd failed to run.
i suspect it was the freebsd
that can not provide ng more than 250.
is there anything i should do ?
maybe tu
On Monday 18 December 2006 00:03, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> i am writing a netgraph module to make PF communicate with netgraph
> subsystem and was wondering which method is better of handling PF tags
> on netgraph part, since they use strings for matching.
>
> Is it better patch ng_tag to handle strings
Hello,
i am writing a netgraph module to make PF communicate with netgraph
subsystem and was wondering which method is better of handling PF tags
on netgraph part, since they use strings for matching.
Is it better patch ng_tag to handle strings too, like setting the type
of hook to either PF tag
Alexander Motin wrote:
While debugging ccp support in mpd I have found strange behaviour in ppp
daemon. In rfc1962 written:
Configuration Options, in this protocol, indicate algorithms that the
receiver is willing or able to use to decompress data sent by the
sender.
But when ppp negot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:52:10 +0800,
dave jones wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone working on implementing UDP lite in FreeBSD? If not,
I'd like to work on it.
Hi,
Can you give us more context on this UDP lite thing? Is this an
RFC/IETF thing or???
Thanks,
George
__
SNIP
> In a FreeBSD router (5.4-stable), there are currently 50 IPSEC VPN
> connections running with 50 remote sites, now I need to add one more (new)
> vpn to it without resetting the existing VPN connection. Therefore I have
> created a script (new-vpn.sh):
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> # Tunnel to kgportsmi
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:52:10 +0800,
dave jones wrote:
Is anyone working on implementing UDP lite in FreeBSD? If not,
I'd like to work on it.
Can you give us more context on this UDP lite thing? Is this an
RFC/IETF thing or???
ftp://ftp.rfc-edi
At Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:52:10 +0800,
dave jones wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone working on implementing UDP lite in FreeBSD? If not,
> I'd like to work on it.
Hi,
Can you give us more context on this UDP lite thing? Is this an
RFC/IETF thing or???
Thanks,
George
__
10 matches
Mail list logo
