Andre Oppermann wrote:
Max Laier wrote:
I don't like the implementation for this reason. It feels hackish to
me. What is the reason that you didn't duplicate the ethernet header
approach in ip_fw_pfil.c? Speed? Did you measure? It is certainly
easier to properly strip off the vlan header
Max Laier wrote:
On Friday 15 December 2006 22:20, Julian Elischer wrote:
Max, further to your comment..
Max Laier wrote:
On Monday 11 December 2006 23:58, Julian Elischer wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
in ipfw layer 2 processing, the packet is passed to the firewall
a
Hi.
While debugging ccp support in mpd I have found strange behaviour in ppp
daemon. In rfc1962 written:
Configuration Options, in this protocol, indicate algorithms that the
receiver is willing or able to use to decompress data sent by the
sender.
But when ppp negotiates different co
Are You a Savvy Investor?
The SmallCap Journal Presents:
Under the Radar Equity
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
investor break
Apparel Manufacturing Associates, Inc.
OTC Platinum Report
Symbol OTC : APPM
Current Price : $0.06
hey traders dont miss this one
Huge news exp
Hi,
Is anyone working on implementing UDP lite in FreeBSD? If not,
I'd like to work on it.
BR,
Dave.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
Hi,
whenever i try to connect to a port of a jail from the
host system, the kernel automaticly assigns the
jail's IP address as the source address to the socket.
I'd assume that this is not a so welcomed behaviour, because
it is because that's the w
>Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>This introduces quite a bit of extra code into the path of IP packets.
Yes, it will add a few extra checks like a "if (pfil_forward_enabled) {...}"
>Some people are very sensitive about anything that slows down that path.
I can introduce a new kernel option - NO_PFIL_F
hello
today i've meet a behaviour, that can be an issue.
i have an lo1 interface with 7 jail addresses
as 192.168.0.0/24, where jails have addresses
from .1-.7 and there is an address for the host
system, that's .14
whenever i try to connect to a port of a jail from the
host system, the kernel au
Max Laier wrote:
I don't like the implementation for this reason. It feels hackish to me.
What is the reason that you didn't duplicate the ethernet header approach
in ip_fw_pfil.c? Speed? Did you measure? It is certainly easier to
properly strip off the vlan header in the pfil hook code an
