Hi,
If you are running VMware 5.x, then you can use the em driver (Intel
Pro/1000) instead, which is far more functional than the lnc driver. To
do so:
1. Shutdown the VMware system
2. Locate the *.vmx file for your virtual machine
3. Open the *.vmx file in your favourite text
Hi George,
Compare to SCTP, TCP Urel is much simpler. Drawback is the (1) lack of
multihoming, (2) directly implmentation of partial reliabiliity. These
drawbacks, however, allows more flexibility for usage.
I am not very familiar with SCTP. I suppose the multihoming support is
the key for SCTP
At Wed, 6 Dec 2006 23:09:39 +0800,
maillist ifiaas wrote:
>
> Hi friends,
>
> This is one of my research project. Our purpose is to modify TCP to
> support unreliable but congestion controlled streaming. The
> motivation is pretty similar to the one of DCCP CCID2. We have
> implemented a prototy
Benjamin D Adams wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 16:25 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Benjamin D Adams wrote:
What my network looks like:
NET
|
NAT/FIREWALL(2.1.24.34)
|
/-[ HUB ]\< put a cheap hub here
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 16:25 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Benjamin D Adams wrote:
> > What my network looks like:
> > NET
> > |
> > NAT/FIREWALL(2.1.24.34)
> > |
> > ---< put a cheap hub here
> > | |
Benjamin D Adams wrote:
What my network looks like:
NET
|
NAT/FIREWALL(2.1.24.34)
|
---< put a cheap hub here
| | |
2.1.24.35 2.1.24.36 2.1.24.37
if you place a cheap 100M
What my network looks like:
NET
|
NAT/FIREWALL(2.1.24.34)
|
---
| | |
2.1.24.35 2.1.24.36 2.1.24.37
There is no DHCP, I don't think it is possablie to do this but I want to
install a
Does anybody have experience with using FreeBSD 4.x or 6.x NFS clients
against a Windows 2003 NFS server? What is the performance relative
to using a FreeBSD NFS server? What is the stability? Does locking
work? Does the Windows 2003 server have extensions that grok file
system flags?
Thanks m
Hi,
I got a firewall with ipfw + dummynet.
system is:
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10
table 1 contains 211 IP addresses.
00502 pipe 11 ip from any to table(1) out via rl0
00502 skipto 2000 ip from any to table(1)
and with pipe configured
ipfw -q pipe 11 config mask dst-ip 0x bw 256Kbit/s
how
On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Brett Glass wrote:
Is adding a hub or a bridge a topology change? I'd argue that it
wasn't.
Um. Adding a normal client machine to an existing hub or switch does
not constitute a topology change. Adding a new hub or bridge most
certainly would constitute a top
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 11:53, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 December 2006 10:11, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Josh Paetzel wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:52, Brett Glass wrote:
> > >> Add a few IPFW "count" rules to count the bytes and packets.
> > >> Then, periodically ha
At 10:53 AM 12/6/2006, Josh Paetzel wrote:
>He specifically said in his original post that putting a machine
>between the router and his lan wasn't an option. His question
>was, "Is there a program where I can see whats going on from the
>computer on that network?" The answer to that question
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 10:11, Julian Elischer wrote:
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:52, Brett Glass wrote:
Add a few IPFW "count" rules to count the bytes and packets.
Then, periodically harvest and reset the counters via a cron job
and write the
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 10:11, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Josh Paetzel wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:52, Brett Glass wrote:
> >> Add a few IPFW "count" rules to count the bytes and packets.
> >> Then, periodically harvest and reset the counters via a cron job
> >> and write the resu
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:52, Brett Glass wrote:
Add a few IPFW "count" rules to count the bytes and packets. Then,
periodically harvest and reset the counters via a cron job and
write the results to a file. You can then prepare tables and charts
which are as simple or a
At 02:13 AM 12/6/2006, Josh Paetzel wrote:
>Just curious.but where is he going to run ipfw? I seriously doubt
>his router can run it, and what good is it going to do him to run it
>on a machine on the network if the network is switched? It's not
>going to be able to see any of the traffic
Hi friends,
This is one of my research project. Our purpose is to modify TCP to
support unreliable but congestion controlled streaming. The motivation
is pretty similar to the one of DCCP CCID2.
We have implemented a prototype on FreeBSD 5.4, and the the
modifications are limited mostly in tcp_in
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:52, Brett Glass wrote:
> Add a few IPFW "count" rules to count the bytes and packets. Then,
> periodically harvest and reset the counters via a cron job and
> write the results to a file. You can then prepare tables and charts
> which are as simple or as fancy as you
Forwarding to net@ list and to Oleg, who has made polling
support for bge(4).
- Forwarded message from MQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: MQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: some questions about bge(4)
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 09:32:27 +
Delivered-To: [
19 matches
Mail list logo
