Add a few IPFW "count" rules to count the bytes and packets. Then,
periodically harvest and reset the counters via a cron job and write
the results to a file. You can then prepare tables and charts which
are as simple or as fancy as you please, without resorting to SNMP
(which isn't secure). A l
On 5/12/2006 9:48 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:30:27PM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote:
A> >If interface, that went down, had reported its state then CARP
A> >would had noticed that and would had lowered its priority,
A> >gave up mastering, and became backup. This will be redunda
Benjamin Adams wrote:
> I'm on a network that has a normal store firewall, setup as a NAT. I'm
> trying to find a way to monitor all bandwidth by clients through that
> firewall. I don't have the ability to just put an inline box to examine
> packets. Is there a program where I can see whats goi
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 11:45, pete wright wrote:
> On 12/5/06, Benjamin Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm on a network that has a normal store firewall, setup as a
> > NAT. I'm trying to find a way to monitor all bandwidth by
> > clients through that firewall. I don't have the ability
On 12/5/06, Benjamin Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm on a network that has a normal store firewall, setup as a NAT. I'm
trying to find a way to monitor all bandwidth by clients through that
firewall. I don't have the ability to just put an inline box to examine
packets. Is there a program
I'm on a network that has a normal store firewall, setup as a NAT. I'm
trying to find a way to monitor all bandwidth by clients through that
firewall. I don't have the ability to just put an inline box to examine
packets. Is there a program where I can see whats going on from the
computer on th
Hi,
A> >If interface, that went down, had reported its state then CARP
A> >would had noticed that and would had lowered its priority,
A> >gave up mastering, and became backup. This will be redundant.
A>
A>Is it impossible to add link state reporting to lnc driver ?
A>I think this woul
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:30:27PM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote:
A> >A> OK, what would then be the right fix to get things working
A> >A> under vmware ? I run a bunch of servers here and some of
A> >A> them are redundant pairs. We have some pressure to virtualize
A> >A> those servers, but we cannot do
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 08:23:50AM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote:
A> Hi,
A>
A> OK, what would then be the right fix to get things working
A> under vmware ? I run a bunch of servers here and some of
A> them are redundant pairs. We have some pressure to virtualize
A> those servers, but we cannot
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 08:23:50AM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote:
A> Hi,
A>
A> OK, what would then be the right fix to get things working
A> under vmware ? I run a bunch of servers here and some of
A> them are redundant pairs. We have some pressure to virtualize
A> those servers, but we cannot do it a
10 matches
Mail list logo
