On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 12:20:46AM +0200, Nicolae Namolovan wrote:
> Hooray, msk.HEAD.diff worked ! But only on the CURRENT..
>
Thanks for the report.
It would be even better if you can post dmesg output related with msk(4)
and e1000phy(4).
> For those who don't know very well the "patch" too
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 03:05:09PM +0300, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Why on AMD64 kern.ipc.nsfbufs always zero:
>
> # sysctl kern.ipc | fgrep nsfbufs
> kern.ipc.nsfbufsused: 0
> kern.ipc.nsfbufspeak: 0
> kern.ipc.nsfbufs: 0
> # netstat -m | fgrep sfbufs
> 0/0/0 sfbufs in use (curren
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:13:46PM +0200, Miroslav Slavkov wrote:
> /0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10
> Load Average |||
>
> Interface Traffic PeakTotal
>
>
> vlan0 in 4.597 MB/s 4.612 MB/s
> 1
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> A friend user reported to me that rwhod wouldn't work in CURRENT
> due to broken outgoing packets. Here's an example:
>
> 16:15:28.212810 IP truncated-ip - 6865 bytes missing! (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id
> 28554, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 7169,
Hi folks,
A friend user reported to me that rwhod wouldn't work in CURRENT
due to broken outgoing packets. Here's an example:
16:15:28.212810 IP truncated-ip - 6865 bytes missing! (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id
28554, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 7169, bad cksum 11c
(->c64b)!) 10.10
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Max Laier wrote:
On Saturday 25 November 2006 23:20, Nicolae Namolovan wrote:
But I need to use it on a production server and the CURRENT one is too
unstable, without too much thinking I just run ping -f 127.0.0.1 and after
some m