Serious em problems under -current on two different platforms

2006-11-17 Thread John Polstra
Folks, I'm using -current from 2006-11-16 05:00 UTC and find that my em interfaces are unusable on two quite different platforms. I've tried a lot of things to make sure it's not a local fubar here, including doing a "make release" using a virgin source tree and installing fresh from the resulting

Re: Automatic TCP send socker buffer sizing

2006-11-17 Thread Mark Atkinson
Andre Oppermann wrote: > This is a patch adding automatic TCP send socket buffer sizing. Normally > the socket buffers are static (either derived from global defaults or set > with setsockopt) and do not adapt to real network conditions. Two things > happen: a) your socket buffers are too small

Re: Automatic TCP send socker buffer sizing

2006-11-17 Thread Andre Oppermann
Pieter de Boer wrote: Andre Oppermann wrote: With automatic TCP send socket buffers we can start with a small buffer and quickly grow it in parallel with the TCP congestion window to match real network conditions. Are you planning to implement something similar for the receive path? Yes, b

Re: Automatic TCP send socker buffer sizing

2006-11-17 Thread Pieter de Boer
Andre Oppermann wrote: With automatic TCP send socket buffers we can start with a small buffer and quickly grow it in parallel with the TCP congestion window to match real network conditions. Are you planning to implement something similar for the receive path? -- Pieter

Re: SV: Automatic TCP send socker buffer sizing

2006-11-17 Thread Andre Oppermann
Morgan wrote: A RELENG_6 version (for FreeBSD 6.x) of the patch is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/tcp_auto_sndbuf-20061116-RELE NG_6.diff Just apply this patch and recompile your kernel. It is activated by default. Downloaded, applied, recompiled, installed and rebooted without a

SV: Automatic TCP send socker buffer sizing

2006-11-17 Thread Morgan
> A RELENG_6 version (for FreeBSD 6.x) of the patch is here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/tcp_auto_sndbuf-20061116-RELE > NG_6.diff > > Just apply this patch and recompile your kernel. It is > activated by default. Downloaded, applied, recompiled, installed and rebooted without any e

Re: Automatic TCP send socker buffer sizing

2006-11-17 Thread Andre Oppermann
Andre Oppermann wrote: With automatic TCP send socket buffers we can start with a small buffer and quickly grow it in parallel with the TCP congestion window to match real network conditions. > The patch is available here: http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/tcp_auto_sndbuf-20061116.diff Any te

FreeBSD 6.X if_bridge and IPFW fwd/divert support

2006-11-17 Thread Nicholas George
Greetings, Does anyone know if IPFW fwd and/or divert work with if_bridge under FreeBSD 6.x? Will Luigi's 4.X patches to enable fwd on bridges work under 6.X? even using if_bridge? Regards, Nick ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fr

How to test a pf firewall with nat

2006-11-17 Thread Gregory Edigarov
Hello Everybody, I am trying to move one of my servers/routers from linux/iptables to freebsd/pf, and need a methodology of testing the pf firewall ruleset before it will go in production. I cannot experiment on live network, because it's a busy server. I only have one other machine avail

How to test a firewall with NAT?

2006-11-17 Thread Gregory Edigarov
Hello Everybody, I am trying to move one of my servers/routers from linux/iptables to freebsd/pf, and need a methodology of testing the pf firewall ruleset before it will go in production. I cannot experiment on live network, because it's a busy server. I only have one other machine avail

Re: ipsec-tools problem

2006-11-17 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 10:30:49AM +0100, Robert M. wrote: > Hi, Hi. > ipsec-tools-0.6.6 installed Did you use port's default options, or did you change some of them ? > No matter what racoon.conf file I use I'm getting the following > info when running racoon in foreground mode: > > 2006-11-

ipsec-tools problem

2006-11-17 Thread Robert M.
Hi, ipsec-tools-0.6.6 installed No matter what racoon.conf file I use I'm getting the following info when running racoon in foreground mode: 2006-11-17 10:26:28: DEBUG: caught rtm:2, need update interface address list 2006-11-17 10:26:28: DEBUG: msg 1 not interesting 2006-11-17 10:26:28: DEBUG: