Hi All,
Unfortunately our company hasn't had the resources to help FreeBSD
much over the years, but I do want to say thank you to the folks who
are helping sort out this issue with the em driver.
That Intel gigabit interface is very, very common on server hardware
nowadays and it means a
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:50 PM 11/13/2006, Ivan Voras wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 12:15 AM 11/13/2006, Scott Long wrote:
>
>> Is this with EM_INTR_FAST enabled also?
>
> Yes. Havent done the stock case yet, but will do so later today.
Do you have a comparison with Linux under the same circu
Hey. I've got one new machine for testing for 1-2 days... here's some output..
With the latest drivers (cvsup'ed from yesterday)
Send box: 2x Intel Xeon 5110 (1.6GHz), SuperMicro X7-DBE, Intel Pro/1000 MT
Server Adapter
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5110 @ 1.60GHz (1600.01-MHz 686-class
At 12:50 PM 11/13/2006, Ivan Voras wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 12:15 AM 11/13/2006, Scott Long wrote:
>
>> Is this with EM_INTR_FAST enabled also?
>
> Yes. Havent done the stock case yet, but will do so later today.
Do you have a comparison with Linux under the same circumstances?
I had a
On (13/11/2006 19:16), Chris Dionissopoulos wrote:
[...]
> > In case somebody is interested..
>
> I'm really interest to test your patch.
It looks like attachment was striped. Resending it.
# This is a shell archive. Save it in a file, remove anything before
# this line, and then unpack it by e
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:15 AM 11/13/2006, Scott Long wrote:
Is this with EM_INTR_FAST enabled also?
Without it, the 2 streams are definitely lossy on the management interface
---Mike
Ok, and would you be able to test the polling options as well?
Scott
__
At 12:15 AM 11/13/2006, Scott Long wrote:
Is this with EM_INTR_FAST enabled also?
Without it, the 2 streams are definitely lossy on the management interface
---Mike
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 12:15 AM 11/13/2006, Scott Long wrote:
>
>> Is this with EM_INTR_FAST enabled also?
>
> Yes. Havent done the stock case yet, but will do so later today.
Do you have a comparison with Linux under the same circumstances?
___
fre
Hello Gleb,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 1:47:31 PM, you wrote:
> On (11/11/2006 12:21), Andrew Thompson wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 10:03:28PM +0200, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
>> > On (10/11/2006 09:38), Andrew Thompson wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 10:00:37PM +0200, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
>>
FreeBSD rip.psg.com 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #3: Sat Nov 11 19:18:23 GMT
2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RIP i386
and for the last four or five days, fxp0 goes dead. it shows up
and active, but no packets move.
down/up does not help. only way out has been reboot.
sugge
At 12:15 AM 11/13/2006, Scott Long wrote:
Is this with EM_INTR_FAST enabled also?
Yes. Havent done the stock case yet, but will do so later today.
---Mike
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:26:36PM -0600, Barry Boes wrote:
B> After the last hang I added giant locks back in and the machine has
B> been up since.
B>
B> I don't have a serial console, just a graphic console. When the
B> machine hangs it stops replying to ethernet packets at all protocol
B> leve
On (11/11/2006 12:21), Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 10:03:28PM +0200, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> > On (10/11/2006 09:38), Andrew Thompson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 10:00:37PM +0200, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> > > > On (09/11/2006 06:32), Andrew Thompson wrote:
> > > > > thompsa
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
a kern/38554 netchanging interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work
s kern/39937 netipstealth
14 matches
Mail list logo
