On 10/22/06, Vladimir Grebenschikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
В сб, 21/10/2006 в 16:08 -0600, Brett Glass пишет:
> At 03:54 AM 10/21/2006, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
>
> > 1. use PF for nat - it does aliasing in kernel space
>
> True, but it doesn't let me translate the packets and
> then con
Doug Barton wrote:
If you're talking about a laptop where you're not sure what the DHCP
server is going to send you, then I have this in /etc/rc.local:
Hi, Doug.
What you think about adding a new feature to dhclient - Alternate IP
Configuration. This configuration can be specified in dhclient
В сб, 21/10/2006 в 16:08 -0600, Brett Glass пишет:
> At 03:54 AM 10/21/2006, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
>
> > 1. use PF for nat - it does aliasing in kernel space
>
> True, but it doesn't let me translate the packets and
> then continue processing within the firewall -- which
> is necessary i
Joe Holden wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to get dhclient to resolve the ip its been given, and set
that as the hostname? (6.2-PRE)
For future reference, this really belongs on freebsd-questions. If you
know for sure that the DHCP server is going to send you a hostname,
then you can put this
Hi all,
Is it possible to get dhclient to resolve the ip its been given, and set
that as the hostname? (6.2-PRE)
Ta,
J
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAI
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Peter Ankerst?l wrote:
I've looked all over the web for some tutorials on how to create
sub-interfaces i FreeBSD..
Something like fxp0.1
Do you mean just additional addresses on an interface like
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-vir
At 10:21 PM 10/21/2006, Julian Elischer wrote:
>you can in two ways..
>
>create a netgraph ksocket node of type divert
>then attach that to a netgraph ng_nat node.
>
>OR in 7.0 you can call netgraph directly
>
>there is a netgraph keyword in ipfw.
How would one create and control the ng_nat node
Hi Raymond,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:12:47AM -0400, Raymond Wagner wrote:
> My ISP provides me up to 5 dynamically assigned addresses out of a /20
> block. I have more than 5 machines on my network, so I have no choice but
> to run NAT, however I would like to force two of those machines onto t
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:58:08AM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 12:47:54AM -0600 I heard the voice of
> Brett Glass, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > How can I replace just the functionality of natd without moving to
> > an entirely new firewall? Can I still select which
