Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 10:34 AM 10/12/2006, Danny Braniss wrote: > >short version: > >the point im trying to make, is that the same setup, where I only change > >the release, is going downhill - with this particular MB. > > But its not the same necessarily. Some of the settings are different. > For example, disable

bge(4) interface link state changes, bad flaps

2006-10-12 Thread Per Gregers Bilse
[I guess I should introduce myself before posting, but I'm a bit pushed for time.] Some weeks ago I decided to upgrade to 6.x in an attempt to get rid of some unrelated problems, and ever since then I've seen fairly bad flaps on fibre Broadcom interfaces. I notice other people have had similar pr

Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Danny Braniss
> >short version: > >the point im trying to make, is that the same setup, where I only change > >the release, is going downhill - with this particular MB. > > But its not the same necessarily. Some of the settings are different. > For example, disable net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable on 6.x if you wa

Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 04:38 AM 10/12/2006, Danny Braniss wrote: short version: the point im trying to make, is that the same setup, where I only change the release, is going downhill - with this particular MB. But its not the same necessarily. Some of the settings are different. For example, disable net.inet.tc

Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Danny Braniss
> Jack Vogel wrote: > > On 10/11/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) > >> dual cpu. > >> running iperf -c (receiving): > >> > >> freebsd-4.100.0-10.0 sec936 MBytes785 Mbits/sec > >> freebsd-5.4 0.0-10.

Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Steven Hartland
Jack Vogel wrote: On 10/11/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) dual cpu. running iperf -c (receiving): freebsd-4.100.0-10.0 sec936 MBytes785 Mbits/sec freebsd-5.4 0.0-10.0 sec413 MBytes346 Mbits/

Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Danny Braniss
> On 10/11/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) > > dual cpu. > > > > running iperf -c (receiving): > > > > freebsd-4.100.0-10.0 sec936 MBytes785 Mbits/sec > > freebsd-5.4 0.0-10.0 sec413 MBytes34

Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Danny Braniss
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:06:17 +0200, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you > wrote: > > >the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) > >dual cpu. > > > >running iperf -c (receiving): >freebsd-4.10 0.0-10.0 sec936 MBytes785 Mbits/sec >freebsd-5.40.0-10.0 sec41

Re: ng_netflow and router performance question

2006-10-12 Thread Ivan Alexandrovich
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:02:38 +0300 Alexander Motin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think, that there is not very good hash function now used in ng_netflow in traffic aggregation. So if > ip-addr varies from 10.60.0.0 to 10.60.100.255 means than destination address will vary in this range and all ot

Re: [PATCH] Make hash.h usable in the kernel

2006-10-12 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:21:09AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >%%% > >Index: sys/sys/hash.h > >=== > >RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/sys/hash.h,v > >retrieving revision 1.2 > >diff -u -p -r1.