Testing on network interface - promisc mode.

2006-08-29 Thread sivakumar.subramani
Hi, I was using following steps to test the promisc mode on the network interface on my system on FreeBSD 6.1. - On machine A, I updated the arp table with the a dummy MAC address (aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff) for the remote interface on Machine B. #arp -s 17.1.1.110 aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:f -

Rising Star Stocks gdki

2006-08-29 Thread ajyuww gomsjfdx
All I ask is you read the info and do your due diligence, you will see the potential It really could'nt hurt to do a little research Company Profile Goldmark Industries, specializes in the production and distribution of Music, Feature Fillms and Television entertainment for North America's most

iwi discarding oversized packets while mtu=1500 for src/dst

2006-08-29 Thread Hans Nieser
Hi, Today I wanted to go back to using FreeBSD on my laptop, which is still installed but hasn't been used for several months because I am still waiting for a stable Intel HDA driver. So I performed a full upgrade of my installed ports. However I ran into an issue that prevented me from logging in

RFC: FreeBSD I/OAT driver

2006-08-29 Thread Jack Vogel
We are making our development driver for the I/OAT engine available for download, experimentation, and comment available at: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42302&package_id=202220 This includes a core driver for the dma hardware and a set of stack changes to allow

Re: kern/102653: TCP stack sends infinite retries for connection in LAST_ACK state

2006-08-29 Thread Mark Linimon
Synopsis: TCP stack sends infinite retries for connection in LAST_ACK state Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Aug 29 22:39:55 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/que

Re: kern/102607: [if_bridge] don't generate random L2 address

2006-08-29 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 28.08.2006 um 18:19 schrieb Andrew Thompson: Pass over to freebsd-net for discussion on the best way to handle this. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=102607 From the PR: 1. change kernel code or to generate static IP address for bridge interface from attached

Re: [fbsd] Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

2006-08-29 Thread Julian Elischer
Jeremie Le Hen wrote: Hi Simon, On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:50:02AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: On 2006.08.25 15:08:13 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: Since a bunch of people have suggested other solutions I just wanted to add me 0.01$CURRENCY, FWIW. Other than missing update for some manu

Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

2006-08-29 Thread Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] Julian Elischer wrote: I need some processes to look elsewhere for DNS information from where the rest of the system looks.. This patch seems to me a simple solution. We over-ride where the resolver looks for r

Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

2006-08-29 Thread Julian Elischer
Phil Regnauld wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (eculp) writes: I assume that you have seen the following: http://www.howtoforge.com/two_in_one_dns_bind9_views That is definitely the right way to do it imho. unless as I said, I cannot run another nameserver on this box.. (there

Re: mpd on sparc64 problem (maybe netgraph involved)

2006-08-29 Thread Julian Elischer
Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: Can't make use of mpd on sparc64. After going up link goes down almost instantly. On sparc64(client): Aug 29 16:32:04 blade mpd: [pppoe0] IFACE: Up event Aug 29 16:32:10 blade mpd: [pppoe0] PPPoE connection closed Aug 29 16:32:10 blade mpd: [pppoe0] device: DOWN event

mpd on sparc64 problem (maybe netgraph involved)

2006-08-29 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
Can't make use of mpd on sparc64. After going up link goes down almost instantly. On sparc64(client): Aug 29 16:32:04 blade mpd: [pppoe0] IFACE: Up event Aug 29 16:32:10 blade mpd: [pppoe0] PPPoE connection closed Aug 29 16:32:10 blade mpd: [pppoe0] device: DOWN event in state UP Aug 29 16:32:10

Re: Problem with uipc_mbuf.c

2006-08-29 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Randall Stewart wrote this message on Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:18 -0400: > Ok, I confirmed it... > > Changing it to be > > atomic_fetchadd_int(m->m_ext.ref_cnt, -1) == 1) > > Fixes the problem.. no more leaks :-D And if you are curious XADD is: The XADD (exchange and add) instruction swaps two o

Re: Problem with uipc_mbuf.c

2006-08-29 Thread Andre Oppermann
John-Mark Gurney wrote: Randall Stewart wrote this message on Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 17:04 -0400: atomic_fetchadd_int(m->m_ext.ref_cnt, -1) == 0) { ^ This should be 1 not 0.. as apparently fetchadd_int returns the old value (at

Re: Problem with uipc_mbuf.c

2006-08-29 Thread Randall Stewart
John-Mark: Ok, I confirmed it... Changing it to be atomic_fetchadd_int(m->m_ext.ref_cnt, -1) == 1) Fixes the problem.. no more leaks :-D R John-Mark Gurney wrote: Randall Stewart wrote this message on Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 17:04 -0400: atomic_fetchadd_int(m->m_ext.ref_cnt, -1)

Re: Netgraph plumbing question

2006-08-29 Thread Rajkumar S
On 8/28/06, Rajkumar S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/26/06, Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > + msg bpf: setprogram { thisHook="in1" ifNotMatch="mixed" } This is not working, and I get an error: ngctl: send msg: Invalid argument Did some more work on this. It seems the full command

Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

2006-08-29 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:02:22PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > I need some processes to look elsewhere for DNS information from where > > the rest > > of the system looks.. This patch seems to me a simple solution. > > We over-ride where the resolver looks for reso

Re: Problem with uipc_mbuf.c

2006-08-29 Thread Randall Stewart
John-Mark: I had read that in the atomic_fetchadd_int() comments.. and was wondering if that was the case.. I don't have an X86 assembler reference.. so I did not bother to see if the asm and comments were in sync... you are right if this is true.. and I can surely make SCTP have this occur.. not

Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

2006-08-29 Thread Oliver Fromme
Julian Elischer wrote: > I need some processes to look elsewhere for DNS information from where > the rest > of the system looks.. This patch seems to me a simple solution. > We over-ride where the resolver looks for resolv.conf using an > environment variable. > This would allow me to rese

Re: Optimizing a high-latency connection

2006-08-29 Thread Brian Candler
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 03:46:22PM +0200, Morgan wrote: > I'm trying som file transfers across the globe. The RTT is almost 400ms and > the transfer rate is painfully slow. There are 24 router hops on the path > and I assume most of the problem is there The number of routers isn't an issue, as lon

[Fwd: Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS]

2006-08-29 Thread Alexey Vesnin
I'm currently working on a similar patch - so you welcome to contact me if you need one. And - by the way - is there's a need for such a patch? then I can post it to this list Alexey "Steel Scorpion 666" Vesnin --- Begin Message --- On 2006.08.25 15:08:13 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > Julian

Re: [fbsd] Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

2006-08-29 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2006.08.29 11:01:48 +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: Hey, > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:50:02AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > > On 2006.08.25 15:08:13 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Since a bunch of people have suggested other solutions I just wanted > > to add me 0.01$CURRENCY, FWIW. > > > >

IP fastforwarding in RELENG_4 and CURRENT/RELENG_6 (fwd)

2006-08-29 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! Sorry for reposting my questions again, I hope they are interesting not only for me... What is the current status of the fast IP forwarding in RELENG_4 and in modern versions (CURRENT/RELENG_6)? I see that this code (either ip_flow.* in RELENG_4 or ip_fastfwd.c in RELENG_6) is always

Re: [fbsd] Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

2006-08-29 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi Simon, On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:50:02AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2006.08.25 15:08:13 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > Since a bunch of people have suggested other solutions I just wanted > to add me 0.01$CURRENCY, FWIW. > > Other than missing update for some manual page (not sure w

Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

2006-08-29 Thread .
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Julian Elischer wrote: > > I need some processes to look elsewhere for DNS information from where > > the rest of the system looks.. This patch seems to me a simple solution. > > We over-ride where the resolver looks for resolv.conf using an >

Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

2006-08-29 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2006.08.25 15:08:13 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > >I need some processes to look elsewhere for DNS information from > >where the rest of the system looks.. This patch seems to me a > >simple solution. We over-ride where the resolver looks for > >resolv.conf using a

Re: [fbsd] Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

2006-08-29 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:17:40PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > It is intersting that people are suggesting tons of really complicated > solutions involving loading essoteric > softwere or setting up complicated virtual machines when listenning to a > simple environment variable > will do the

Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

2006-08-29 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: a process to a network interface alias on the fly? So if you had ten possible Alas I don't see the way to bind an abstract process to the specific IP address on hosts with several IPs. For applications which use connect(2), ...short of usin

Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

2006-08-29 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Duane Whitty wrote: Well, I think maybe your solution is the simplest and it sounds like an interesting feature. I do wonder though if it would be possible to bind a process to a network interface alias on the fly? So if you had ten possible Alas I don't see th

Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

2006-08-29 Thread Phil Regnauld
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (eculp) writes: > > I assume that you have seen the following: > > http://www.howtoforge.com/two_in_one_dns_bind9_views That is definitely the right way to do it imho. > I found it interesting although I haven't had time to give it a try > especially since I'm thinkin