Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
great.. I have been in ipfw(2) the last week and have some sugestions
for
increasing its efficiency.. especially the code that times out
dynamic rules.
Can you explain your suggestions in detail?
I sent the following to luigi:
I repeat it he
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 05:00:58PM +0200, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> Dmitry Morozovsky (marck) writes:
> >
> > I suppose pinging pjd@ did not work? ;)
>
> Good question -- why did Pawel not commit them himself if he could ? :)
>
No idea. I sent him an email asking on 28 Jun 2006, but I've no
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 07:12:32AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
L> The problem is, my provider does not provide specific service names,
L> but it will accept anything i supply. So when i run the three ppp instances,
L> they will all match, and the code in ng_pppoe.c will happily take the
L> first repl
Hi Dan,
Yes, this is true. But for a simple IPC between master agent and
sub-agents I think it is still good enough.
On 8/7/06, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the last episode (Aug 07), Gleb Smirnoff said:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 12:18:19AM +0300, victor cruceru wrote:
> > I'm glad t
In the last episode (Aug 07), Gleb Smirnoff said:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 12:18:19AM +0300, victor cruceru wrote:
> > I'm glad to announce an implementation of the venerable SNMP SMUX
> > protocol for FreeBSD SNMP agent, bsnmpd. You can grab it from its
> > wiki page http://wikitest.freebsd.org/S
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 12:18:19AM +0300, victor cruceru wrote:
v> Hi folks,
v> I'm glad to announce an implementation of the venerable SNMP SMUX
v> protocol for FreeBSD SNMP agent, bsnmpd.
v> You can grab it from its wiki page http://wikitest.freebsd.org/SnmpSmux
v> There you will find instruction
