Re: Plans to port OpenBSD trunk(4)?

2006-08-03 Thread lukem . freebsd
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Antony Mawer wrote: Is there any interest or plans underway to port the trunk(4) feature from OpenBSD? OpenBSD's trunk(4) appears to be exactly what I'm looking for, but there doesn't appear to be anything I can find on a port to FreeBSD. http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/m

Re: ethernet bridge and dhcpd

2006-08-03 Thread Jax
Purushotham Nayak wrote: Hi All, Hey! Sorry you dind't get my answer first because I sent in wrong format, so i post it again: Here is a thought, don't setup dhcp server on a bridge. I tried to use firewalling on this but it works differently than in linux where you can control the traff

Re: Broadcom 5780

2006-08-03 Thread Pavol Čierny
Problem solved. The bge driver in STABLE has been modified yesterday, and it works if_bge.c,v 1.91.2.15 2006/08/02 15:01:59 glebius although it detects the NIC as 5714... maybe it's 5714 and not 5780 ... but it works... :) Thanks for the hints --- Best regards Pavol Čierny > The best solutio

RE: Broadcom 5780

2006-08-03 Thread David (Controller AE) Christensen
The best solution would be to MFC the driver from -CURRENT to 6.1R, the second alternative would be to add the 5780 PCI vendor/device ID to the 6.1R driver, add a BGE_ASICREV_BCM5780 definition to if_bgereg.h, and make sure that any references to the 5714 also include a reference to the 5780. (

ethernet bridge and dhcpd

2006-08-03 Thread Purushotham Nayak
Hi All, I have a routerboard with two ethernet ports (sis0 and sis1) with FreeBSD 6.0 on it. I've been trying to setup a bridge between them and also run the dhcpd server on the routerboard. I've setup sis0 with an IP address and sis1 is just marked "up" in rc.conf. The bridge seems to work bec

Dynamic Rule Corpses of IPFW 2

2006-08-03 Thread Intron
I've set up a stateful IPFW rule to resist DoS attach. The rule is allow tcp from any to me tcpflags syn limit src-addr 10 But I found that there're many corpses in dynamic rules, which may resist normal accesses. There isn't correspondence between those corpses and existing TCP connections.

Re: Broadcom 5780

2006-08-03 Thread Pavol Čierny
Hi, today I noticed that the STABLE bge driver was modified yesterday (2006-08-02), and it looks like it supports also 5780, so the NICs could work Now I have trouble compiling kernel :-( make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/crypto/rijndael/rijndael-alg-fst.c. Stop *** Error code 2 ---

Re: Broadcom 5780

2006-08-03 Thread Pavol Čierny
Hello, I wrote some weeks ago about broadcom 5780 that wasn't detected in FreeBSD 6.1R After trying CURRENT, it was detected, but as Broadcom 5714 (i didn't know it was 5714) In the documentation of bge in FreeBSD 5.x and 6.x it says that the driver already has support for 5714... What can

Re: ipw-firmware port (Intel Pro/Wireless 2100)

2006-08-03 Thread Florent Thoumie
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 18:01 -0400, Jonathan Herriott wrote: > Hi All! > > I have been having trouble using the ipw-firmware port. I am able to > get it up and running, and it is even associated to my wireless > network. I use dhclient to get a lease and set everything up, which > works fine (thi

Re: Can I pursuade someone to commit this patch? (Re: Multiple IP addresses in a jail.)

2006-08-03 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:40:53AM +0200, Phil Regnauld wrote: > Josef Karthauser (joe) writes: > > Dear current folk, I'm forwarding this thread from the -net list where I > > asked the question, is it possible to have more than one IP address in a > > jail? The answer is yes, with Pawel's patch.

Re: Plans to port OpenBSD trunk(4)?

2006-08-03 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:50:39PM +1000, Antony Mawer wrote: > Hi list, > > Is there any interest or plans underway to port the trunk(4) feature > from OpenBSD? OpenBSD's trunk(4) appears to be exactly what I'm looking > for, but there doesn't appear to be anything I can find on a port to > Fr