[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to test a multicast streaming media application by selectively
dropping packets in the network connecting the source to the viewer.
The capability I need is to drop N consecutive packets, where N ranges
from 1 to 50 and is chosen via the command line.
I had hope
I need to test a multicast streaming media application by selectively
dropping packets in the network connecting the source to the viewer.
The capability I need is to drop N consecutive packets, where N ranges
from 1 to 50 and is chosen via the command line.
I had hoped to do this with dummynet a
Hi,
I want to bring up the idea again of announcing all interfaces on
creation/insert rather than just physical ones as it is right now. The
difference will be that pseudo interfaces will be reported to devd and
this lets actions be taken in userland.
Anyone care to test.
Andrew
Index: etc/d
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:15:42PM +0200, Marko Lerota wrote:
> Nash Nipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >Hi Marko,
> >
> > Actually i dont find that load critical. I think those lines well tell that
> > actually the process is running 581m42s and now it utilizes 13.48%
>
> Sometimes it
Hi,
One of my collegues helped me.
bpf described in the following page is useful.
http://canmore.sdf-eu.org/freebsd/bpf.html
And libdnet is a wrapper of the bpf on FreeBSD.
Code using libdnet seems to be portable with Linux and so on.
From: Hideki Yamamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IPv6 r
- Forwarded message from Michel Gravey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 18:16:08 +0200
From: Michel Gravey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Frank Steinborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: question about MPSAFE network stack disabled
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Internet
Michel Gravey wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> I'm runnning a 6.1 release, installed first as 5.3 release in the past.
>
> Your trick does fix the warning (removing debug.mpsafenet line in
> loader.conf).
>
> Since I'm using pf, does the bug you mentionned still be in the 6.1 release
> (don't think so b
Michel Gravey wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've got the following message during boot (on a 6.1 release custom kernel)
> WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance.
[...]
> Would you please help me to find the cause of that message, to fix the
> resulting degraded performance i
Hello all,
I've got the following message during boot (on a 6.1 release custom kernel) :
WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance.
I do not use ipv6 nor ipsec, and they are disabled in my kernel config.
The network driver used is bge.
bpf, pf and altq are set, but I d
Nash Nipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hi Marko,
>
> Actually i dont find that load critical. I think those lines well tell that
> actually the process is running 581m42s and now it utilizes 13.48%
Sometimes it was 80%
> which sounds like a "kernel tuning issue" if you have excluded nfs
On 5/23/06, Mark Jayson Alvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
A while ago, a group of individuals have demonstrated
us with devices that can be used to extend your
network throughout every corner of your company
through the use of electric outlet... A quick googling
tells me that such technolog
Marcin Jessa wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2006 20:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
> Mark Jayson Alvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > A while ago, a group of individuals have demonstrated
> > us with devices that can be used to extend your
> > network throughout every corner of your company
> > throu
Hello!
What is the current status of the fast IP forwarding in RELENG_4 and in
modern versions (CURRENT/RELENG_6)? I see that this code (either ip_flow.*
in RELENG_4 or ip_fastfwd.c in RELENG_6) is always included into kernel
(no separate option for it), but is disabled by default. What are dra
On Tue, 23 May 2006 20:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
Mark Jayson Alvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A while ago, a group of individuals have demonstrated
> us with devices that can be used to extend your
> network throughout every corner of your company
> through the use of electric outlet... A qui
Hi,
Harti Brandt wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
As somebody else said, that's a hardware thing. In any case there is an
Austrian city (don't remember the name) where the provider is forced to
put this down, because they cannot meet the requirements for off-band
emissi
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
MJA>Hi,
MJA>
MJA>A while ago, a group of individuals have demonstrated
MJA>us with devices that can be used to extend your
MJA>network throughout every corner of your company
MJA>through the use of electric outlet... A quick googling
MJA>tells me tha
16 matches
Mail list logo