Re: nd6_lookup prints bogus messages with point to point devices

2006-05-23 Thread gnn
At Tue, 23 May 2006 13:43:01 +0900, jinmei wrote: > Thanks, please do to. I believe the patch also fixes this problem > report: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/93220 > > So, could you also confirm this and give feedback to (or close) the > report? (I'll send a follow-up message

Re: Anyone heard about Broadband over power lines???

2006-05-23 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote: Hi, A while ago, a group of individuals have demonstrated us with devices that can be used to extend your yes, it works wonderful. But there is a huge but. It works wonderful as long as the data volume is low. The problem is that the powerlines are not shield

Re: Anyone heard about Broadband over power lines???

2006-05-23 Thread fooler
- Original Message - From: "Mark Jayson Alvarez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 11:14 AM Subject: Anyone heard about Broadband over power lines??? Hi, A while ago, a group of individuals have demonstrated us with devices that can be used to extend your network

Anyone heard about Broadband over power lines???

2006-05-23 Thread Mark Jayson Alvarez
Hi, A while ago, a group of individuals have demonstrated us with devices that can be used to extend your network throughout every corner of your company through the use of electric outlet... A quick googling tells me that such technologies are already existing long time ago and some Electric comp

Re: How to Quicken TCP Re-transmission?

2006-05-23 Thread Mark Allman
Bruce- > > Alberto Medina, Mark Allman, Sally Floyd. Measuring the Evolution of > > Transport Protocols in the Internet. ACM Computer Communication > > Review, 35(2), April 2005. > > http://www.icir.org/mallman/papers/tcp-evo-ccr05.ps > > What a trip, I just read this paper on the trai

panic: m_prepend: MH_ALIGN not PKTHDR mbuf

2006-05-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
I got this panic as a non-privileged user running the stress2 test component that does random syscalls: panic: m_prepend: MH_ALIGN not PKTHDR mbuf cpuid = 1 KDB: enter: panic [thread pid 15370 tid 100536 ] Stopped at kdb_enter+0x32: leave db> wh Tracing pid 15370 tid 100536 td 0xc5561000 kdb_

Redundant Trunked VLANs Revisited

2006-05-23 Thread Michael Jeung
Regarding: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2004-March/ 003210.html I'm trying to implement a similar solution, but instead of using ng_bridge, I'm using ng_one2many. sw1--em0--\ /--default(ng_eiface)-- ngeth0 |multi0(ng_one2many)--vl

Re: improving transport over lossy links ?

2006-05-23 Thread Brian Candler
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:10:39PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > It looks like its an issue with the USB serial device and or driver. > Whether the driver or the actual device (or both) not sure. If I put > the same 2 modems put on 2 regular serial ports, ppp is able to see > the carrier is down a

Re: How to Quicken TCP Re-transmission?

2006-05-23 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Mark Allman wrote: >> Thank you for your reminder. Actually, I understand you and >> RFC 2018. What I really concern is how wide support (and being enabled >> by default) SACK has obtained. For we do not always transfer data >> between hosts running FreeBSD and maint

Re: How to Quicken TCP Re-transmission?

2006-05-23 Thread Mark Allman
> Thank you for your reminder. Actually, I understand you and > RFC 2018. What I really concern is how wide support (and being enabled > by default) SACK has obtained. For we do not always transfer data > between hosts running FreeBSD and maintained by network expert. SACK is quite widely de

Re: How to Quicken TCP Re-transmission?

2006-05-23 Thread mag
Thank you for your reminder. Actually, I understand you and RFC 2018. What I really concern is how wide support (and being enabled by default) SACK has obtained. For we do not always transfer data between hosts running FreeBSD and maintained by network expert.

Re: How to Quicken TCP Re-transmission?

2006-05-23 Thread Mark Allman
> Actually, TCP is a single sliding window protocol, which limits its > performance on seriously lossy and long delay transmission media. > We assume that a sender has sent packets [A] [B] [C] [D] [E] while > the receiver has received packets [A] [C] [E]. With TCP the receiver can > only

Re: How to Quicken TCP Re-transmission?

2006-05-23 Thread mag
Actually, TCP is a single sliding window protocol, which limits its performance on seriously lossy and long delay transmission media. We assume that a sender has sent packets [A] [B] [C] [D] [E] while the receiver has received packets [A] [C] [E]. With TCP the receiver can only tell the se

Re: improving transport over lossy links ?

2006-05-23 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 06:15 AM 23/05/2006, Ian Smith wrote: I had a browse through /sys/dev/usb/{uft,ucom}* but was well out of my depth .. it =looks= like DCD (aka RLSD) changes should be picked up ok; perhaps you're right about some odd init string or such - good luck! It looks like its an issue with the USB

Re: (no subject)

2006-05-23 Thread mag
Try Bill Paul's ndis(4) to use driver for Microsoft Windows. An example: 1. cd /sys/modules/if_ndis/ 2. ndiscvt -i yourdriver.inf -s yourdriver.sys -o ndis_driver_data.h 3. make 4. make install 5. kldload if_ndis.ko If successfully, and add the following line into /boot/loader.conf:

Re: (no subject)

2006-05-23 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Ratan Dey wrote: Hi, I have a motherboard ASUS NCL-DE/SCSI. This motherboard has a built in NIC card of BROADCOM 5700. I am using FreeBSD 5.4 and i am not able to use my NIC card. So how can i utilized this BROADCOM 5700 NIC in freebsd 5.4 Regards- Rata The bge d

Re: How to Quicken TCP Re-transmission?

2006-05-23 Thread Bill Vermillion
"Bits dont fail me now!" was what Brian Candler muttered as he hastily typed this on Mon, May 22, 2006 at 14:06 : > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 07:51:33PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I want to transmit data between host A and host B. The link between > > these two hosts is really bad: PING

(no subject)

2006-05-23 Thread Ratan Dey
Hi, I have a motherboard ASUS NCL-DE/SCSI. This motherboard has a built in NIC card of BROADCOM 5700. I am using FreeBSD 5.4 and i am not able to use my NIC card. So how can i utilized this BROADCOM 5700 NIC in freebsd 5.4 Regards- Rata --

Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem

2006-05-23 Thread Nash Nipples
Hi Marko, Actually i dont find that load critical. I think those lines well tell that actually the process is running 581m42s and now it utilizes 13.48% of available WCPU which is a long run and hopefully successfull if no nfs failures took place. Im pretty confident that FreeBSD wont let a

Re: How to Quicken TCP Re-transmission?

2006-05-23 Thread Mark Allman
> 1. Receiver should tell sender to re-send as soon as possible. >(But TCP makes receiver purely passive) This isn't really going to help you at all. With SACK (especially, but even without it) the receiver isn't really in a whole lot better position than the sender to judge when a packet is

Re: improving transport over lossy links ?

2006-05-23 Thread Ian Smith
Hi Mike, On Sun, 21 May 2006 at 16:03:39 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > Correct. Its always dialing into a terminal server that is connected > via PRIs. Usually Lucent PM3, sometimes Cisco 5800s depending on the > location they dial from. I guess you won't want to be messing with their configs

Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem

2006-05-23 Thread Marko Lerota
Marko Lerota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 429 root 1 40 1204K 820K - 0 581:42 13.48% nfsd > 430 root 1 40 1204K 820K - 0 10:37 0.00% nfsd > > Here is the config > rc.con