Julian Elischer writes:
| Evren Yurtesen wrote:
| > Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| >
| >> Evren Yurtesen writes:
| >> | I tried to bridge vlan with ethernet but I am having troubles.
| >> | | net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: fxp0:2,fxp3:2,fxp2:3,vlan0:3
| >> | net.link.ether.bridge: 1
| >> | net.link.ether.bridg
Evren Yurtesen wrote:
Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Evren Yurtesen writes:
| I tried to bridge vlan with ethernet but I am having troubles.
| | net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: fxp0:2,fxp3:2,fxp2:3,vlan0:3
| net.link.ether.bridge: 1
| net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw: 0
| net.link.ether.bridge_ipf: 0
| net.link.et
Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Evren Yurtesen writes:
| I tried to bridge vlan with ethernet but I am having troubles.
|
| net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: fxp0:2,fxp3:2,fxp2:3,vlan0:3
| net.link.ether.bridge: 1
| net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw: 0
| net.link.ether.bridge_ipf: 0
| net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw_drop:
Evren Yurtesen writes:
| I tried to bridge vlan with ethernet but I am having troubles.
|
| net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: fxp0:2,fxp3:2,fxp2:3,vlan0:3
| net.link.ether.bridge: 1
| net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw: 0
| net.link.ether.bridge_ipf: 0
| net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw_drop: 0
| net.link.ether.bridge
It's been nearly four years, I was wondering if anyone has had a thought
on this change yet. :)
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:15:55 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: RFC: Update
I tried to bridge vlan with ethernet but I am having troubles.
net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: fxp0:2,fxp3:2,fxp2:3,vlan0:3
net.link.ether.bridge: 1
net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw: 0
net.link.ether.bridge_ipf: 0
net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw_drop: 0
net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw_collisions: 0
fxp0 - fxp3 brid
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:50:10PM +0700, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
> A question about features: is it worth adding functionality of matching
> range of tags? For example:
>
> ipfw add pass ip from any to any tagged 1-5,10,20
i think it is a useful feature, and if you reuse the existing code
for ma
12.05.06 в 20:53 Luigi Rizzo в своём письме писал(а):
> I've tried Andrey Elsukov's ipfw "tag/tagged" patches from:
> http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw_tags/
>
> Tested on 5.5-PRERELEASE production server with moderate
> load - rock stable [I've also looked through the code - patch
12.05.06 в 20:53 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> I've tried Andrey Elsukov's ipfw "tag/tagged" patches from:
> http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw_tags/
>
> Tested on 5.5-PRERELEASE production server with moderate
> load - rock stable [I've also looked through the code - patch
> is small, so it
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:32:22AM -0300, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
> Vadim Goncharov wrote:
> > Hi, All!
> >
> > I've tried Andrey Elsukov's ipfw "tag/tagged" patches from:
> > http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw_tags/
> >
> > Tested on 5.5-PRERELEASE production server with moderate
Vadim Goncharov wrote:
Hi, All!
I've tried Andrey Elsukov's ipfw "tag/tagged" patches from:
http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw_tags/
Tested on 5.5-PRERELEASE production server with moderate
load - rock stable [I've also looked through the code - patch
is small, so it simply can't b
Hi, All!
I've tried Andrey Elsukov's ipfw "tag/tagged" patches from:
http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw_tags/
Tested on 5.5-PRERELEASE production server with moderate
load - rock stable [I've also looked through the code - patch
is small, so it simply can't be any bugs there ;)].
P
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:12:29PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> >I'm loosely of the opinion that the membership array should be
> >variable length, and that we should default it to 20, but have a
> >significantly larger maximum. It's not horribly efficient, but also
> >wouldn't be so particula
13 matches
Mail list logo
