Re: bge and "no carrier" on IBM Blade 8843L1U

2006-05-05 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Fri, 5 May 2006, Jonathan Feally wrote: > Why whould you want to use that kernel option? I was told it was broken without the option also. I was told that ifconfig said "no carrier" with the default GENERIC kernel (while it worked fine with CentOS). (Since it doesn't have network access and

Re: bge and "no carrier" on IBM Blade 8843L1U

2006-05-05 Thread Jonathan Feally
Why whould you want to use that kernel option? I don't see that it is a requirement on the blade how-to. My guess is you haven't specifically set the interface to a media speed and duplex as the option indicates to me that the driver would not attempt auto negotiation. If the option is not requ

bge and "no carrier" on IBM Blade 8843L1U

2006-05-05 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
The hardware is a IBM BladeCenter HS20 (8843L1U). ifconfig says "no carrier" (see below). (Networking does work when it running aother non-BSD operating system.) Running FreeBSD 6.1 RC2 with GENERIC plus kernel configuration: options BGE_FAKE_AUTONEG When this extra kernel option is in place,

Sendmail SSL certificates cache?

2006-05-05 Thread Nash Nipples
Sendmail ssl server certificates cache where? thanks. Nash - How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org