Re: New version of iwi(4) - Call for testers [regression!]

2006-04-27 Thread Max Laier
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 23:29, Max Laier wrote: > On Monday 10 April 2006 14:32, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Latest version: > http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/new_iwi/20060418.both_nofw.tgz > > Thanks to Sam, this should work in IBSS (adhoc) mode now. > > Why don't you commit it into HEAD, yet? :)

Re: DHCP Over PPPoE

2006-04-27 Thread Julian Elischer
A few things.. 1/ thisn is a FreeBSD list so we are not very familiar with linux. 2/ PPPOE uses PPP which is a point-to-point protocol and does not support broadcast. 3/ DHCP is a broadcast protocol and does not support point-to-point networks. 4/ PPP (oE) has its own IP allocation mechanis

Re: [fbsd] Re: [fbsd] Network performance in a dual CPU system

2006-04-27 Thread Vlad GALU
On 4/27/06, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > >> I missed the original thread, but in answer to the question: if you set > >> net.isr.direct=1, then FreeBSD 6.x will run the netisr code in the ithread > >> of the network device driver. This

Re: [fbsd] Re: [fbsd] Network performance in a dual CPU system

2006-04-27 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: I missed the original thread, but in answer to the question: if you set net.isr.direct=1, then FreeBSD 6.x will run the netisr code in the ithread of the network device driver. This will allow the IP forwarding and related paths in two threads inste

Re: DHCP Over PPPoE

2006-04-27 Thread Brian Candler
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:38:03PM +0530, JOBY THAMPAN wrote: > > > Hi all , > > > > I have a setup like this > > > > Linux Machine 1 > > Eth0- DHCP Server > > > > > > Linux Machine 2 > > Eth1- Got IP

Re: [fbsd] Re: [fbsd] Network performance in a dual CPU system

2006-04-27 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi, Robert, On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:54:21PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > >> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND > >> 60 root 1 -44 -163 0K 8K WAIT 355.6H 72.17% swi1: > >>net > >> 39 ro

Re: VLAN interfaces and routing

2006-04-27 Thread Brian Candler
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:55:11PM +0100, William wrote: > The switch is a Cisco 3550, trunking is setup on the port and I've > allowed the VLANS I'm interested in using. > > The end result is being able to communicate with all devices on said > VLANS which is fantastic but my next objective is to

Re: [fbsd] Network performance in a dual CPU system

2006-04-27 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 60 root 1 -44 -163 0K 8K WAIT 355.6H 72.17% swi1: net 39 root 1 -68 -187 0K 8K WAIT52.3H 5.22% irq28: bge0 40 root 1 -68 -1

Re: [fbsd] Network performance in a dual CPU system

2006-04-27 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi Marcos, On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 08:46:00AM -0500, Marcos Bedinelli wrote: > Hello all, > > We have a 2.4GHz Intel Xeon machine running FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p2. Due > to heavy network traffic, CPU utilization on that machine is 100%: > > === > > mull [~]$top -S > last pid: 94989; load averag

DHCP Over PPPoE

2006-04-27 Thread JOBY THAMPAN
> Hi all , > > I have a setup like this > > Linux Machine 1 > Eth0- DHCP Server > > > Linux Machine 2 > Eth1- Got IP from DHCP Server > Eth0- PPPoE Server >

Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing

2006-04-27 Thread Ferdinand Goldmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello. > > I did that and compiled the kernel. > Then I restarted the system and enabled sysctl kern.polling.enable=1 > > It seems that it has no effect in the system. Maybe bge driver doesn't > like polling? At least from a quick glance in the polling(4) manpage I can