Brad writes:
| On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:36:17AM -0700, Paul Saab wrote:
| > Brad wrote:
| > >
| > >Source exists for newer Broadcom Gig chips (575x and derivatives) yet
| > >there is no documentation available for that either.
| >
| > Documentation does exist, just not publically.
|
| Ya, just
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:36:17AM -0700, Paul Saab wrote:
> Brad wrote:
> >
> >Source exists for newer Broadcom Gig chips (575x and derivatives) yet
> >there is no documentation available for that either.
> >
> >
> Documentation does exist, just not publically.
Ya, just as documentation does ex
Brad wrote:
Source exists for newer Broadcom Gig chips (575x and derivatives) yet
there is no documentation available for that either.
Documentation does exist, just not publically.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Hi,
I ran into a problem recently with the following config:
freebsd client -> wireless repeater -> wireless AP
It turned out that our packets from our dhclient was not seen by the
Wireless AP. Windows XP had no such problems. After a little digging, it
turns out that the windows XP dhclien
Hi,
I have tried to debug this and it turns out that it is not an allocation
failure at all. It happens as part of uma_reclaim, which will eventually
call uma_zfree_internal which increments the counters.
When I use the following patch, uma_reclaim will skip uma_zfree_internal for
both mbuf and m
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:59:39AM +0200, Lars Erik Gullerud wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
>
> >Could you try attached patch? It should fix problem when link goes UP but
> >network is still down.
> >
> >About bge resets: you should try if_bge.c rev.1.126, it may help.
> >
> >P
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
Could you try attached patch? It should fix problem when link goes UP but
network is still down.
About bge resets: you should try if_bge.c rev.1.126, it may help.
P.S. anyway, please report how is it going.
I'll try your patch, however as we can't re
Ludovit Koren wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> is there any possibility to set the routing statically on a multi-homed
> host so, that the packet is sent back via the same interface, as it has
> came from? Something like more default routes (it is not good name for
> it, I hope you can understand what I mean),
