Hi,
I am relatively new to FreeBSD (I use 6.0-RELEASE-p6) having only used
it for approximately 2 months, and have run into a little bit of a
problem with my wireless setup. I am currently using a WUSB54G ver. 4
(Linksys Wireless-G USB network adapter:
http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite
I've read here before (or maybe some other freebsd list) that cards
like the Soekris 1401 don't gain as much as you'd expect due to moving
packets to/from the card over the PCI bus. But the context is usually
one of trying to encrypt packets to increase throughput.
So the question is whether thes
Hi,
I am running into a problem with em driver possibly missing rx
interrupts.
I have the following setup
Linux NFS server -- FreeBSD 6.0 ethernet bridge -- Linux NFS client
and I run a test on the NFS client that repeatedly mounts an NFS
directory, retrieves a file, and unmounts the dir. T
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Kelly Yancey wrote:
>
> > I'm curious: how are you performing NAT on your tunnelled traffic?
>
> the answer is simple: do not NAT on the ipsec interface though it's
> not fully correct because I do even NAT traffic that goes like:
>
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Kelly Yancey wrote:
I'm curious: how are you performing NAT on your tunnelled traffic?
the answer is simple: do not NAT on the ipsec interface though it's
not fully correct because I do even NAT traffic that goes like:
A lan1(ipsec only) --- gw(NAT) --- lan2(ipsec on
Thanks Brian.
Simply put Bit-Twist is smaller, do more, medium specific (Ethernet II - IEEE
802.3) suite.
Bittwist (packet generator) does not differs much from tcpreplay program. I
would admit if you say tcpreplay can do everything that bittwist can do. But
bittwist implementation i
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 08:02:04AM -0700, Yeow C.H. wrote:
> It is designed to compliment tcpdump, which by itself has done a great
> job
> in capturing network traffic. With Bit-Twist, you can now regenerate the
> captured traffic onto a live network. Packets are generated from save
