> One problem which we are experiencing right now is that any user from
> private lan can use any ip address he wants. If he boots his computer with a
> stolen ip address, the poor owner of that machine(not active at the moment)
> will give automatically up his ip address to this user. The same
Good day,
We are trying to reorganize our local area network and I need some tips on how
you are managing your own lan...
We have a vanilla pc router with interface facing our private lan and
interface facing the Internet.
One problem which we are experiencing right now is that any use
VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> nat-t support detection is quite bad actually (and not only with
> FreeBSD), as it just detects NAT-T support in kernel includes, not in
> compiled kernel.
Rhahhh, le boulet, le boulet, le boulet...
I forgot to install includes... so config f
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
I am currently working on a udp multicast application written in C for
FreeBSD (6.x)
For our test cases in many different network types we found that
fragmentation poses as a significant problem for quality and reliability.
Packets that get frag
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> In 6.0 SECURITY, what starts up lo0? It's not starting by default, and
> /etc/rc.d/netif has no effect on the interface. I *believe* this is the
> cause of a problem I'm having with xinerama, but I can't seem to figure out
> how to get the loopback t
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:18:38PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
...
> It used to be hard coded. Today we force it to the front of the list
> in the network_interfaces=auto case, but don't do anything special with
> it in the other case. We could change to code to always make it the
> first item in
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:49:53PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 02:40:57PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> ...
> > Yes, and I found it. There was a second instance of network_interfaces
> > farther down in the /etc/rc.conf file. It only listed the bge0 interface,
> > and I'm
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 02:40:57PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
...
> Yes, and I found it. There was a second instance of network_interfaces
> farther down in the /etc/rc.conf file. It only listed the bge0 interface,
> and I'm certain it's being installed by a port. I found the same problem
i
--On Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:55:34 -0800 Brooks Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 10:07:36AM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
In 6.0 SECURITY, what starts up lo0? It's not starting by default, and
/etc/rc.d/netif has no effect on the interface. I *believe* this is the
ca
I'm trying to get a vlan based firewall working, but having a problem
with ARP & DHCP not working well
(dhcp could be maybe not working well because of ARP)
The network is setup:
IP: xyz.zyx.xzy.0/24
[ISP router -> ISP Switch] -> firewall ->{vlans-tagged}->layer2
switch->other switches
(I don't
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 10:07:36AM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> In 6.0 SECURITY, what starts up lo0? It's not starting by default, and
> /etc/rc.d/netif has no effect on the interface. I *believe* this is the
> cause of a problem I'm having with xinerama, but I can't seem to figure out
> how t
VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Yvan,
> It should work (I'm compiling it with a modified 6.1-PRERELEASE, but
> did not tried for now with just 6.1-PRERELEASE+NAT6T patch).
I've forced natt support in the Makefile.
> Could you send me the logs ?
Asap, I have to make some place o
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Eric Masson wrote:
> Matthew Grooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[]
> > http://ipsec-tools.sf.net/freebsd6-natt.diff
>
> I tried to compile ipsec-tools with 6.1-PRERELEASE natt patched kernel &
> headers and so far, didn't succeed.
It should work (I'm
Matthew Grooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
Nice work.
> If you are interested in using NAT-T, you should have a look at
> Yvans kernel patch which offers everything but transport
> pre-fragmentation support ...
>
> http://ipsec-tools.sf.net/freebsd6-natt.diff
I tried to
In 6.0 SECURITY, what starts up lo0? It's not starting by default, and
/etc/rc.d/netif has no effect on the interface. I *believe* this is the
cause of a problem I'm having with xinerama, but I can't seem to figure out
how to get the loopback to come up on boot. Any help would be appreciated.
On 3/22/06, Matthew Grooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> If anyone would like to use FreeBSD as a VPN gateway but have the
> usual Win2K/XP clients to support, here is a free software product that
> may be of interest ...
>
> http://www.shrew.net/download
>
> The VPN Client was
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 04:17:23PM -0600, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> If you are interested in using NAT-T, you should have a look at
> Yvans kernel patch which offers everything but transport
> pre-fragmentation support ...
This looks cool. This looks very, very cool.
Now if only I had free t
17 matches
Mail list logo
