Re: static routes

2006-03-20 Thread Sten Daniel Sørsdal
Ludovit Koren wrote: Hi, I realized on several different versions of FreeBSD including 5.4-STABLE, when using static routes to specific subnets and the WAN link goes down for unpredictable reasons, the server gets ICMP redirect message and rearranges routes to use default router. Then all the tr

Re: New version of iwi(4) - Call for testers [regression!]

2006-03-20 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Max Laier wrote: Let me clear up some things here: 1) This is not "mine" driver. It's Damien's with a lot of patches that I hope to test by putting out this version. My sincerest apologies to Damien and everyone involved. I was going by historical convention where when someone posts a new,

How can i detect if a received UDP got fragmented from userland?

2006-03-20 Thread Sten Daniel Sørsdal
I am currently working on a udp multicast application written in C for FreeBSD (6.x) For our test cases in many different network types we found that fragmentation poses as a significant problem for quality and reliability. Packets that get fragmented are more likely to get dropped than packets t

Re: IP_SENDIF?

2006-03-20 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 12:08:35PM -1000, Dave Cornejo wrote: > In summary it's a piece missing for FreeBSD to implement the function > of the Linux socket option SO_BINDTODEVICE, which forces packets > transmitted on the socket to be sent on the bound device. I'm currently out of commission with

Re: New version of iwi(4) - Call for testers [regression!]

2006-03-20 Thread Max Laier
On Monday 20 March 2006 23:06, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > dima wrote: > > I had a chance to test the driver more throughly today. It can't connect > > to some access points. Sometimes reboot helps, sometimes not. I didn't > > experience this with the driver currently present in the tree; well, I > > u

Re: IP_SENDIF?

2006-03-20 Thread Dave Cornejo
> Dave Cornejo wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Some time ago (Oct 2004) there was some talk of implementing > > IP_SENDIF, a search of the mailing list turns up nothing since then. > > Did anything ever happen with this? > > Can you please explain the semantics and use of this option? I have > recei

Re: New version of iwi(4) - Call for testers [regression!]

2006-03-20 Thread Darren Pilgrim
dima wrote: I had a chance to test the driver more throughly today. It can't connect to some access points. Sometimes reboot helps, sometimes not. I didn't experience this with the driver currently present in the tree; well, I used /usr/ports/net/iwi-firmware (not the kmod version). This can be

Re: multiple routing tables

2006-03-20 Thread Andre Oppermann
Julian Elischer wrote: > > I'm looking at a problem where I want onemachine to really look like 2. > this means I want to have 2 separate routing tables if possible. > > I know I could do it with eas if I could user Marco Zec's vimage patches > but I need to have a path forward to 6.x and beyond

Re: IP_SENDIF?

2006-03-20 Thread Andre Oppermann
Dave Cornejo wrote: > > Hi, > > Some time ago (Oct 2004) there was some talk of implementing > IP_SENDIF, a search of the mailing list turns up nothing since then. > Did anything ever happen with this? Can you please explain the semantics and use of this option? I have received a probably simil

Re[2]: New version of iwi(4) - Call for testers [regression!]

2006-03-20 Thread dima
> the new version at: > http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/new_iwi/20060315.both.tgz > > should build for RELENG_6 and HEAD. Make sure to have the latest RELENG_6 > checkout with the taskqueue changes. > > This version supports version 3.0 and version 2.4 firmware. From iwi_fw you > can build

Re: Low network performance after upgrade from FreeBSD 4.8 to 6.0

2006-03-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:33:33PM +0100, OxY wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Bohuslav Plucinsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Cc: > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:10 PM > Subject: Low network performance after upgrade from FreeBSD 4.8 to 6.0 > > > >Hello, > > > >I use the Fre

RELENG_6: IPFilter appears to leak active IP states, leading to blocked traffic

2006-03-20 Thread Jos Backus
I am seeing the following problem after upgrading a RELENG_4 system to (a very recent) RELENG_6: Within about two days of uptime the system wil no longer allow incoming or outgoing traffic, necessitating a reboot. A possible symptom is that the `active' counter in `ipfstat -s' slowly creeps up to 4

Re: Low network performance after upgrade from FreeBSD 4.8 to 6.0

2006-03-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:10:20PM +0100, Bohuslav Plucinsky wrote: > The "top" utility shows 100% CPU load: What about top -S to show the kernel threads (since that's what's using 90% of your CPU)? > last pid: 771; load averages: 0.25, 0.06, 0.02 >

Question on protocol drain routines

2006-03-20 Thread Herve Boulouis
[reposting on -net in the hope to attract the concerned people's attention :)] Hi, I'm starting to deploy 6.0-STABLE (from mid january) to progressively replace all the 4.9 servers we have here and I'm seeing a curious thing : On all 6.0 which get moderate to high network activity (ie webmail to

Re: static routes

2006-03-20 Thread Ludovit Koren
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 04:16:07 -0800 > [EMAIL PROTECTED](Giorgos Keramidas) said: > > On 2006-03-20 12:51, Ludovit Koren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I realized on several different versions of FreeBSD including > > 5.4-STABLE, when using static routes to specific subne

Re: IP_SENDIF?

2006-03-20 Thread gnn
At Sun, 19 Mar 2006 21:34:19 -1000 (HST), Dave Cornejo wrote: > > Hi, > > Some time ago (Oct 2004) there was some talk of implementing > IP_SENDIF, a search of the mailing list turns up nothing since then. > Did anything ever happen with this? > No, but if you have a patch we're up for reviewin

Re: Low network performance after upgrade from FreeBSD 4.8 to 6.0

2006-03-20 Thread Martin Hudec
Hello, Bohuslav Plucinsky wrote: I use the FreeBSD box as the firewall with NAT (ipfw + natd). When I've upgraded the box from 4.8-20030810-STABLE to 6.0-RELEASE I've noticed a performance degradation. CPU states: 8.8% user, 0.0% nice, 59.6% system, 31.6% interrupt, 0.0% idle PID USERNAME

Re: Low network performance after upgrade from FreeBSD 4.8 to 6.0

2006-03-20 Thread OxY
- Original Message - From: "Bohuslav Plucinsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:10 PM Subject: Low network performance after upgrade from FreeBSD 4.8 to 6.0 Hello, I use the FreeBSD box as the firewall with NAT (ipfw + natd). When I've upgraded the box f

Low network performance after upgrade from FreeBSD 4.8 to 6.0

2006-03-20 Thread Bohuslav Plucinsky
Hello, I use the FreeBSD box as the firewall with NAT (ipfw + natd). When I've upgraded the box from 4.8-20030810-STABLE to 6.0-RELEASE I've noticed a performance degradation. I've only one workstation behind the firewall and throughput of downloading an ISO image through the firewall with 6.0

Re: static routes

2006-03-20 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-03-20 12:51, Ludovit Koren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I realized on several different versions of FreeBSD including > 5.4-STABLE, when using static routes to specific subnets and the WAN > link goes down for unpredictable reasons, the server gets ICMP > redirect message and rear

static routes

2006-03-20 Thread Ludovit Koren
Hi, I realized on several different versions of FreeBSD including 5.4-STABLE, when using static routes to specific subnets and the WAN link goes down for unpredictable reasons, the server gets ICMP redirect message and rearranges routes to use default router. Then all the traffic is routed to the

Current problem reports assigned to you

2006-03-20 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description --- o [2006/01/30] kern/92552 net A serious bug in most network drivers fro f [2006/02/12] kern