Re: ipv6 panic in 6.0 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]: kern/85780: 'panic: bogus refcnt 0' in routing/ipv6])

2006-03-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 06:15:56PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I've been adding KTR debugging to try and track down the cause of this > recurring problem (FYI: debug.mpsafenet=0 is no longer working around > it). To refresh your memory, here is the panic: > > db> wh > Tracing pid 24 tid 100012

Re: TCP_COMPAT_42 support

2006-03-10 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Looks to me like skyr decided to close the connection, and it closed as expected. I think the problem is probably above the TCP layer - have you tried an older version of rlogin to see if that makes a difference? Hmm. Thanks Mike, Until you wrote t

Re: FAST_IPSEC and tunnelled packets processing

2006-03-10 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 08:36:40PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:53:03 +0100, [FAST_IPSEC and ipip decapsulation] > Bug taken by me :-) I'll try your patch and commit as necessary. Good. As I reported to other FreeBSD developpers in private mails, the same m_copydata is

Re: FAST_IPSEC and tunnelled packets processing

2006-03-10 Thread gnn
At Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:53:03 +0100, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:02:36PM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote: > [.] > > If I recall the IPIP handling is different from KAME because there is > > support for IPIP encapsulation independent of the IPsec protocols while > > KAME onl