Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:11:42PM +1100, Nik Lam wrote:
I'm not sure if what I'm seeing is an artefact of me doing something
unusual with my design or if there is a bug in if_bridge.
I'm dividing my LAN into two parts using a pair of intel pro 1000 (em)
interfaces i
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:11:42PM +1100, Nik Lam wrote:
> I'm not sure if what I'm seeing is an artefact of me doing something
> unusual with my design or if there is a bug in if_bridge.
>
> I'm dividing my LAN into two parts using a pair of intel pro 1000 (em)
> interfaces in an if_bridge brid
I am having some really weird problems with home WLAN setup.
The AP is a FreeBSD 4.11 system with a Netgear MA311. It has
been a functioning AP for more than a year. It has worked fine
with various FreeBSD flavors using a Netgear MA401 (I'm writing
this over connection with this card now). It has w
I'm not sure if what I'm seeing is an artefact of me doing something
unusual with my design or if there is a bug in if_bridge.
I'm dividing my LAN into two parts using a pair of intel pro 1000 (em)
interfaces in an if_bridge bridge. I've configured this bridge with STP
(802.1d) although I don'
I've been adding KTR debugging to try and track down the cause of this
recurring problem (FYI: debug.mpsafenet=0 is no longer working around
it). To refresh your memory, here is the panic:
db> wh
Tracing pid 24 tid 100012 td 0xf802be9fa560
panic() at panic+0x164
rtfree() at rtfree+0xb4
nd6_na
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:34:16AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
Y> > Is this something that will be applied to 5.x - RELEASE at some point?
Y>
Y> 5.5 will be the last RELEASE on the 5.x line, so it's the last
Y> chance now. Alas, I don't feel myself competent enough just to
Y> apply this to RELENG_5
Vince Hoffman wrote:
This may sound silly but if performance is that bad have you checked if
you have a Duplex mismatch ? (one side set to full manually and the
other to auto commonly results in duplex mismatches in my experience.
(see http://www.cites.uiuc.edu/network/autosense.html or use g
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:37:32PM -0500, Christopher McGee wrote:
> Yar Tikhiy wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:59:08AM -0500, Christopher McGee wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:03:45PM -0500, Christopher McGee wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
I've just installed 6.0/AMD64 on an Asus A8V, which features a vr interface.
I'm getting tons of "vr0: rx packet lost" kernel messages as soon as I start
transfering some files on my LAN. Needless to say, network performance is
VERY poor (r
Hello.
I've just installed 6.0/AMD64 on an Asus A8V, which features a vr interface.
I'm getting tons of "vr0: rx packet lost" kernel messages as soon as I
start transfering some files on my LAN. Needless to say, network
performance is VERY poor (ranging from 100KB/s to 1MB/s *).
I've looked i
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:59:08AM -0500, Christopher McGee wrote:
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:03:45PM -0500, Christopher McGee wrote:
Carp, vlans, and em is still not supported in 5.4 release, but I have
read about a patch that works. Can
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:59:08AM -0500, Christopher McGee wrote:
> Yar Tikhiy wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:03:45PM -0500, Christopher McGee wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Carp, vlans, and em is still not supported in 5.4 release, but I have
> >>read about a patch that works. Can anyone point me
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:03:45PM -0500, Christopher McGee wrote:
Carp, vlans, and em is still not supported in 5.4 release, but I have
read about a patch that works. Can anyone point me in the right direction.
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=25292+0+/
From: Chris Dionissopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Shawn Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Trying to make a Host into a gigabit hub for testing
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 03:27:41 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([2
From: Joerg Pulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> > From: Max Laier
> >>
> >> there have been a lot of problem reports with iwi(4) lately.
> >> Can everybody who does have problems with it please take a look at:
> >>
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/new
On Monday 06 March 2006 15:33, Joerg Pulz wrote:
> Content-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> > From: Max Laier
> >
> >> there have been a lot of problem reports with iwi(4) lately.
> >> Can everybody who does have problems with it please take a look at:
> >>
>
kamal kc wrote:
> i found that igmp, rsvp uses ip options.
> which other protocols use the ip options ..
>
> protocols between 0 to 60 (ip protocol number)
> would be fine to know about.
>
> any pointers would be highly valuable to me.
Anything which is layered on top of IP could use IP options,
Hello all,
I have some news about this subject:
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 13:46 +, Brian Candler wrote:
> After:
>
>192.168.0.0/24 192.168.0.0/24
> --+-- GW1 GW2 -+---
> | [nat1] [nat2]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
From: Max Laier
there have been a lot of problem reports with iwi(4) lately.
Can everybody who does have problems with it please take a look at:
http://people.freebsd.org/
dear all,
i found that igmp, rsvp uses ip options.
which other protocols use the ip options ..
protocols between 0 to 60 (ip protocol number)
would be fine to know about.
any pointers would be highly valuable to me.
thanks,
kamal
__
Do You Yahoo
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2006/01/30] kern/92552 net A serious bug in most network drivers fro
1 problem total.
21 matches
Mail list logo
