Re: freevrrpd and em

2006-02-28 Thread spe
Hi, FreeVRRPd project is halted and not supported anymore. You can take a look at carp for doing the same job efficiently. If someone want to continue this project, let me know. Regards, Sebastien. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Venturoli wrote: Hello. I'm trying to get freevrrpd working on an

nat issue

2006-02-28 Thread Yasholomew Yashinski
I'm not sure what changed, as I haven't made any changes in the past 48 hours that I recall other than a portupgrade, however when I got home this afternoon my NAT was hosed. I'm using tun0 (PPPoE over hme0) on FreeBSD 6.0 sparc64. from pf.conf: anon_gw="206.248.137.44" nat_net="192.168.1.0/28" t

Re: TCP_COMPAT_42 support

2006-02-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi Mike & net@ people, "Mike Silbersack" wrote: > > Thanks Mike, > > Well I fixed a local problem of parity on my FreeBSD end, by changing to > > XTerm*eightBitInput:False > > XTerm*eightBitOutput: False > > xrdb -merge ~/.Xdefaults > > But

Re: TCP_COMPAT_42 support

2006-02-28 Thread Mike Silbersack
> Thanks Mike, > Well I fixed a local problem of parity on my FreeBSD end, by changing to > XTerm*eightBitInput:False > XTerm*eightBitOutput: False > xrdb -merge ~/.Xdefaults > But rlogins & telnets to the 4.2BSD Symmetric still die af

Re: TCP_COMPAT_42 support

2006-02-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Mike Silbersack wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Julian Stacey wrote: > > Anyone know if modern FreeBSD still supports TCP_COMPAT_42 ? > TCP_COMPAT_42 just tweaked how we generated TCP initial sequence numbers. > The lack of it should not be impacting your ability to connect to machines > of any vin

Re: Only one concurrent connection in jail possible (5.4)

2006-02-28 Thread Peter Prucker
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:05, Phil Regnauld wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (service_ist) writes: > > Hi, > > > > I've setup a server with 16 jails using 5.4. Right after bringing it > > up I wondered about its bad performance. > > We need to know many things here: > > - CPU, RAM, disk,

Re: Only one concurrent connection in jail possible (5.4)

2006-02-28 Thread Phil Regnauld
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (service_ist) writes: > Hi, > > I've setup a server with 16 jails using 5.4. Right after bringing it up I > wondered about its bad performance. We need to know many things here: - CPU, RAM, disk, disk layout, swap What does disk I/O look like ? (gstat)

Only one concurrent connection in jail possible (5.4)

2006-02-28 Thread service_ist
Hi, I've setup a server with 16 jails using 5.4. Right after bringing it up I wondered about its bad performance. CPU load does not increase 30% - and these are pikes when I'm running Spamassassin. The usual sytem load is 0.00 The problem must be something different. When I installed squid, I no