Re: bind9 + host command issue in FreeBSD-5.4

2006-02-17 Thread Doug Barton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello all! > > I am not sure if this is the right place to discuss this issue For future reference, the bind-users list at ISC is probably a better forum, but this is as good as any. :) > but I am > experiencing strange behaviour with bind9 + host command with some dom

Re: deadc0de panic in fxp driver

2006-02-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 03:15:14PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Peter Holm's stress test gave me this on an SMP machine running fresh > 7.0: > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > fault virtual address = 0xdeadc0de > fault code = supervisor w

Re: ATH max packet size?

2006-02-17 Thread Sam Leffler
Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote: I am still waiting for my PCI -> MiniPCI bridge for my CM9 card so i am unable to test this, and even though i read the source i am still unsure, so i was hoping a kind generous soul would answer my question; What is the max packet size (mtu) available using the ath

bind9 + host command issue in FreeBSD-5.4

2006-02-17 Thread tpeixoto
Hello all! I am not sure if this is the right place to discuss this issue but I am experiencing strange behaviour with bind9 + host command with some domains that bind are _not_ authoritative as the following example: # uname -a FreeBSD server2.mydomain.com.br 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0:

ATH max packet size?

2006-02-17 Thread Sten Daniel Sørsdal
I am still waiting for my PCI -> MiniPCI bridge for my CM9 card so i am unable to test this, and even though i read the source i am still unsure, so i was hoping a kind generous soul would answer my question; What is the max packet size (mtu) available using the ath driver? The reason i ask is